Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir - 01.03.1977, Side 30

Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir - 01.03.1977, Side 30
28 ÍSLENZKAR LANDBÚNABARRANNSÓKNIR or more progeny in both groups. From this covariance the correlations are estimated: Weaning weight of ewe lambs: Carcass weight of ram lambs 0.79 Weaning weight of ewe lambs: Dressing percentage of ram lambs —0.17 These results show little effect of selection. GENETIC VARIATION BETWEEN FLOCKS As mentioned before the variance between flocks in weaning weight was 16.3% of the total variance. After correction this had risen to 33.6%, but then all the lambs had been corrected to a similar age. The ram lambs are often selected across flocks and one must therefore know how much of the flock difference is genetic in origin to get correct ranking. The genetic difference between sheep flocks is little studied. The main reason for this is the breeding structure, each ram only being used in one flock and therefore con- founded with the flock. The method proposed by Robertson and Rendel (1954) for estimating the genetic difference in milk yiéld between herds by regression of daughter yield on herd mean can be used in this material for lambs sired by the rams used in artificial insemination. There were a total 2212 of progeny by 28 sires in this material. The heritability of the flock average was estimated from the regres- sion as 0.03±0.05. Eikje (1974b) has esti- mated this heritability as 0.03 in Norway, by a method of regression of the progeny test results on flock average of the flock in which the ram was born. The lambs sired by the rams used in artificial insemination are often born before the normal lambing season starts in the flock and may therefore receive special treat- ment. It is therefore difficult to determine how good an estimate of the genetic dif- ference between flocks the data can give. DISCUSSION This study shows that environmental factors studied here account for 38.8% of the total variation in weaning weight. One can there- fore get a substantial gain in accuracy of selection by correction for these factors. Such correction factors can be very useful when selecting the lambs kept for replacement in the autumn. Selection is undertaken when the lambs are weighed and one must there- fore have correction factors avilable before- hand. In progeny tests the correction factors can be estimated from the data. The greatest problem is the correction of the age effect of lambs because of the dif- ferent treatments the lambs in the same flock often get in the autumn. The genetic variation in these traits is so great that resonable genetic gain should be obtained by selecting for weight of lambs. Because of the negative genetic correlation between weaning weight and dressing percen- tage the use of mass selection only for weaning weight is not recommended. Organized progeny testing is not common in the breeding work in Iceland. The relati- vely low heritability of carcass weight and the fact that one must álso select for meat quality characters which are only observable after slaughter should favour the use of progeny testing in the breeding work. Because of the large size of many flocks one can practise progeny testing on a within farm basis. In areas with smaller average flock size, the Norwegian ram circle system is an alternative.

x

Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir
https://timarit.is/publication/1499

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.