Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir - 01.03.1977, Page 42

Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir - 01.03.1977, Page 42
40 ÍSLENZKAR LANDBÚNAÐARRANNSÓKNIR estimates of this correlation in the literature. The genetic correlation of the number of lambs and the ewe body weight is found to be about 0.10. In studies in other countries this correlation is also found to be positive but shows wide variation (Purser, 1965; Chang and Rae, 1972; Eikje, 1970; Shelton and Menzies, 1968; Young et al, 1963). DISCUSSION The prolificacy of ewes is the most important trait in the sheep breeding in Iceland. Adal- STEINSSON (1971) gives the economic weight of 10,5:1 for number of 'lambs and carcass weight. The heritability estimates found here indicate that considerable genetic gain could be obtained for this character by selection. The selection response is lowered because this is a sex limited character and one must therefore use pedigree selection or progeny testing for the trait. If using progeny testing one must plan progeny testing on a large scale if one is to have some selection intensity for the daughter production-traits that will be obtained at the second stage of the progeny testing. The progeny test will also give longer generation interval. In this material it is found that the selection intensity in pedigree selection, measured as the prolificacy of the mother in the year the lamb is kept for breeding, is low, especialiy for ram Iambs (Jónmundsson, 1975b). The weight of lambs produced by the ewe is affected by the mothering ability of the ewe of which milk production is the most important factor. The lamb weight is also affected by genes for growth rate which the lamb has inherited partly from its mother, and the covariance between these two factors. The weight of lambs produced by the ewe is therefore an expression of the genes of two related individuals in two different generations. The genetic covariance between direct and maternál effects will influence the genetic gain in weaning weight. As shown by Hanrahan (1976) the progeny test for weaning weight will give a rather low gain in this trait if this covariance is negative and the heritability of maternal effect is high compared with the direct effect. Then the performance test is a better selection alterna- tive for weaning weight. The body weight of a ewe influences the cost of production due to the higher main- tenance cost of the heavy ewe than the light one. With selection both for fecundity and score for lamb production the body weight will be increased because of the positive genetic correlation of these traits with ewe body weight. As discussed by Cunningham and Gjedrem (1970) the body weight can be restricced and included in a selection index. As they show it is not a realistic alternative to restrict the body weight unless it is recorded and included in the index by a negative weighing. This will slightly lower the genetic gain for score of lamb production. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The data used in this study were obtained from the Agricultural Society of Iceland. I want to express my thanks to Dr. Halldór Pálsson, Director of the Society, and Mr. Sveinn Hállgrímsson, adviser in sheep bre- eding, for making the data available to me. Most of the study was done when I was studying at the Institute of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Agricultural University of Norway. I want to express my thanks to Professor Dr. Harald Skjervold and the staff of the Institute for providing working facilities, when I was staying there.

x

Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir
https://timarit.is/publication/1499

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.