Náttúrufræðingurinn

Årgang

Náttúrufræðingurinn - 1964, Side 44

Náttúrufræðingurinn - 1964, Side 44
38 NÁTTÚ RU FRÆÐINGURINN feíl. With the exception o£ Bláfell, which is considerably dissected, the table- mountains are isolated plateaux, roughly circular in form, with flat or gently convex tops and abrupt sides. They are mostly built up of móberg (or pala- gonite, i. e. vitreous, clastic rocks of basaltic composition) and pillow-lavas. But the tops of these mountains are capped by lavaflows of crystalline basalt. According to a hypothesis on the origin of tablemountains first advanced by the author in 1943, the socle of móberg and pillows was formed by subglacial eruption piling up this material in water-filled vaults melted into the ice-slieet from beneath. Later on, as the ice had melted through and the accumulated material reached above the water, the eruption became subaerial and changed its character, producing the normal lavaflows which are now seen to cap the tablemountains and in some cases form vcritable shieldvolcanoes on the top of them (e. g. Hrútfell). During the whole process tlie erupted material was moulded within the walls of ice rnore or less into the present shape of the mountains. The volcano Leggjabrjótur is in every respect a typical shielclvolcano — except where it meets low ground on the south and southeast sicle. There the lava ends in an abrupt scarp, up to 300 m. high, facing the lake Hvítárvatn and the valley Fródárdalur. This scarp was interpreted by Niels Nielsen (1927) as a tectonic fault. And as the flat or gently sloping lava plateau above the scarp was obviously never covered by ice, he assumecl a postglacial age for the vol- cano as well as for the fault. The author’s research led to a different interpretation: The irregular sinuous form of the scarp of Leggjabrjótur is not indicative of a fault line. On the other hand it coincides exactly with the border of the unglaciated lava. The scarp is striped horizontally with a serics of shore-lines up to a lieight exceeding 100 m. above its base (Fig. 5). On the top of the scarp the lava plateau has broken up, tilted, and subsided in many places near thc eclge (Fig. 6.) But below the scarp there are no signs of fracturing ordislocationof any kindof thebedrock. The edge of the scarp shows lava structure quite normal for shicldvolcanoes, but down on the scree-covered slope only pillowlava and sonte móberg crop out. In the authour’s interpretation the scarp of Leggjabrjótur is the front of a lava flow, owing its extraordinary height and anomalous rock structures to ponding of the lava against a thick ice-margin, possibly floating in deep water. In other words, the origin ol' Leggjabrjótur is analogous to that of the table- mountains as outlined above. Tlie only difference is tbat during their formation the typical tablemountains were moulded by thicker ice on all sides, and most of them were afterwards covered by the regenerating ice-sheet. As the highest ice-marginal shore-line (630 m. a. s. I.) in Kjölur is not found on Leggjabrjótur it ntay be assumed that this volcano first came into existence after the ice-sheet to the south ol' Kjölur had thinned sufficiently to allow a southward draining of the area. According to our present knowledge of stages in tlie deglaciation of Iceland (cf. References) this development must have taken place near the end of the Budi stage, whicli in all probability was syn- chronous with the Salpausselká — Ra stage of Fennoscandia.

x

Náttúrufræðingurinn

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Náttúrufræðingurinn
https://timarit.is/publication/337

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.