Jökull


Jökull - 01.01.2015, Side 25

Jökull - 01.01.2015, Side 25
Delimiting Bárðarbunga and Askja volcanic systems with Sr- and Nd-isotope ratios Veiðivötn basalts (Manning and Thirlwall, 2014). In addition, both Sr- and Nd-isotope of this lava (Table 1) fall within the range of Bárðarbunga-Veiðivötn vol- canics. Further studies of this large lava are needed but the Hf isotope data of Koornneef et al. (2012) to- gether with our Sr and Nd isotope ratios agree with the tectonic lineation that strongly suggest an origin from the Bárðarbunga magma system. Gígöldur and Urðarháls craters: eruptive fissures associated with Askja? The single sample of the large Gígöldur crater row (sample Gig-1) has isotope ratios suggesting an affil- iation within Askja volcanic system (Table 1, Figures 2 and 3). In addition, the neighbouring W-E trend- ing eruptive fissure on the eastern side of interglacial Urðarháls lava shield (sample URD-1) also produced basalts with isotope ratios akin to Askja volcanic sys- tem. Further work on these impressive and highly pe- culiar crater rows is needed before detailed discus- sion of their origin. In principle, however, this ei- ther suggests an inter-fingering relationship between the two volcanic systems, or that the two magmatic systems at depth erupt through the same tectonic frac- tures. The results presented here are only based on some of the most recent products in the region north of Vatnajökull that tend to support the former proposi- tion. However, the latter explanation, which may op- erate on a longer time scale cannot be eliminated yet. Taken together with the complex tectonic settings in this region, namely the intersection of the two dom- inant tectonic lineaments of Iceland (e.g. Jónsson et al., 1991), it is clear that further studies of older lavas above the Iceland mantle plume centre would be valu- able. Bárðarbunga: the largest magma producer in Ice- land? Magma production at the Bárðarbunga volcanic sys- tem is thought to be amongst the highest in Ice- land. However, in their compilation of lava vol- ume estimates over historical time, Thordarson and Larsen (2007) concluded that Bárðarbunga was only the fourth highest producer of magma. We note, however, that when adding the volumes of the Great Þjórsárhraun and the multiple lava fields of Tungna- árhraun (e.g. Vilmundardóttir et al., 2000), together with Krepputunguhraun and Fjallsendahraun to the shield-volcanoes, such as Trölladyngja, Bárðarbunga is likely to get the first place as the highest magma production volcanic system during the Holocene in Iceland. In addition, there are hints (from Sr- and Nd isotope ratios; Carpentier and Sigmarsson, unpub- lished results) that the large (∼5 km3) Bárðardalur lava flow (Hjartarson, 2004), also belongs to this very large volcanic system. Finally, improved volumetric data and age determinations are needed for quantita- tive treatment and comparison of the magma produc- tivity between different volcanic systems above the mantle plume. CONCLUSIONS Isotope ratios of Sr and Nd are relatively uniform for a given volcanic system above the Iceland man- tle plume and the delineation of these systems can be readily achieved with radiogenic isotope ratios. The large Krepputunguhraun and Fjallsendahraun (Fram- bruni) lava fields, as well as the very recent Holu- hraun and the older Holuhraun lava field, are shown to have originated within the Bárðarbunga volcanic sys- tem. These results amplify the magma productivity at Bárðarbunga during the Holocene, but also emphasize the complex inter-fingering of eruption fissures at the junction of Askja and Bárðarbunga volcanic systems. Acknowledgement We thank our colleagues, including several post-docs and graduate students at IES that aided with sample collection during the 2014–2015 Holuhraun eruption. Chantal Bosq and Delphine Auclair helped with the Sr and Nd isotope analysis. Guðrún Larsen read over first draft of the manuscript. Rósa Ólafsdóttir pre- pared Figure 1. Margaret Hartley, Thomas F. Kok- felt and Bryndís Brandsdóttir provided constructive reviews and comments. All this is gratefully acknowl- edged. SAH is especially grateful to Guðrún Sverris- dóttir and Gylfi Sigurðsson for their hard work and dedication to the isotope facilities at IES. Financial support came from the Iceland Science Fund through the project "Volcano Anatomy" and the Nordic Vol- canological Centre (Nordvulk) at IES. JÖKULL No. 65, 2015 25
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120

x

Jökull

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.