Jökull


Jökull - 01.01.2015, Page 39

Jökull - 01.01.2015, Page 39
Grain characteristics of tephra from Katla and Hekla eruptions the fine one between 0.063 and 0.125 mm. Largest grains were >1.6 cm and mean grain size is 0.8 mm. Samples at 29.5 and 42 km distance are unimodal, the coarse mode had shifted to 2–4 mm and 1–2 mm respectively but the fines have become insignificant. Mean grain size is 2.4 and 1.3 mm, respectively. 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Ves tan Hafrafells C u m u la ti ve % P hi Φ Mean grain size: 0.335 Φ (0,793 mm) Sorting: 3,423 Φ Wt % ≤4 Φ (≤0,063 mm): 17,83 Wt % ≤6,5 Φ (≤0,011 mm): 1,43 W t % Hekla-1947 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 C u m u la ti ve % W t % P hi Ф F ljóts dals heiði bulk Mean grain size: -1,264 Ф (2,402 mm) Sorting: 1,792 Ф Wt % ≤4 Ф (≤0,063 mm): 2,74 Wt % ≤6,5 Ф (≤0,011 mm): 0,19 Hekla-1947 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Hamragarðaheiði bulk Mean grain size: -0.361 Ф (1.284 mm) Sorting: 1.123 Ф Wt % ≤4 Ф (≤0,063 mm): 1.51 Wt % ≤6,5 Ф (≤0,011 mm): 0.15 Hekla-1947 C u m u la ti ve % P hi Φ W t % Figure 10. Examples of grain size distribution graphs of Hekla-1947 tephra near the axis of maximum thickness, west of Hafrafell, at Fljótsdalsheiði and Hamragarðaheiði. The violet bars represent the grain size distribution weight % and the blue line the cumu- lative weight % plotted against Φ. – Kornastærðargröf við þykktarás Heklu-1947, vestan Hafrafells, á Fljóts- dalsheiði og Hamragarðaheiði. Fjólubláu stöplarnir sýna þyngdarprósentu og bláa línan uppsafnaða þyngdarprósentu á móti kornastærð (Φ). The mean grain size of all samples is plotted against distance on Figure 11. The mean grain size of the bulk samples changes from 9.4 mm at 3.5 km distance to 0.23 mm at 68 km and is halved every 13– 14 km, somewhat less than Thorarinsson (1954) found by using median grain size. A systematic variability appears in samples collected from the two units where the bottom grey brown unit is always more coarse- grained than the top brownish black unit in the same location. The maximum grain size closest to Hekla had longest diameters in tens of cm and up to 4 cm at 30 km distance (Thorarinsson, 1954). The proportion of ash ≤4 Φ (≤0.063 mm) in the Hekla-1947 layer is not very prominent. We assume that the grain size data from Thorarinsson (1954) presents a realistic proportion of ash ≤0.063 mm. The fines have to be looked at separately (Figure 12) in the bulk samples and in the grey brown and black tephra pairs of Thorarinsson (1954). In the bulk samples the proportion of ash ≤0.063 mm is less than 10 Wt%, ex- cept at 68 km where it is about 24 Wt% (excluding the possibly reworked tephra collected at 19 km in 2013). In samples of the grey brown tephra the proportion of ash ≤0.063 mm does not exceed 8 Wt% and changes irregularly with distance, e.g. it is only 5.6 Wt% at 74 km. In samples of the black tephra it varies signif- icantly, from about 8 to 33 Wt%, but changes irregu- larly with distance. The samples collected at 42 km in summer of 2013 and at 49 km presumably in 1947 are similarly low in fines ≤0.063 mm. This may indicate that conditions during deposition, and not reworking, caused this ap- parent lack of fines at this distance from source. Fine material ≤5 Φ (≤0.031 mm) and ≤6.5 Φ (≤0.011mm) was not analysed in samples from Thor- arinsson (1954). The preservation of the newer sam- ples is questionable but the similarly low amount of fines at 42 km and 49 km pointed out above suggest that the proportions at 42 km, <7 Wt% and <1 Wt% respectively, are at least indicative that proportions of very fine ash are relatively low in the H-1947 tephra. Grain shape characteristics Grain shape analyses on the Hekla-1947 tephra were carried out on samples from two locations; at W of Hafrafell at 19 km and at Hamragarðaheiði 42 km from source. Changes within the 23 km distance are very small and not significant. In general the Hekla-1947 grains are closer to being equant/circular in shape than elon- gated and have rather uneven surfaces. Grains closer JÖKULL No. 65, 2015 39
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120

x

Jökull

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.