Jökull


Jökull - 01.01.2015, Page 41

Jökull - 01.01.2015, Page 41
Grain characteristics of tephra from Katla and Hekla eruptions Table 2. Results of grain morphology measurements of the Hekla-1947 tephra. The parameters measured are Elongation (lower values - more elongated grains), Ruggedness (lower values - more rugged grains) and Cir- cularity (higher values - more circular grains). – Kornalögunarniðurstöður á Heklu-1947 gjósku. Mældar voru þrjár breytur, ílengd (lægri gildi - ílengri korn), hrjúfleiki (lægra gildi - hrjúfari korn) og hringlögun (hærri gildi - betri hringlögun). Unit Elongation Ruggedness Circularity Distance (km) Vestan Hafrafells 0.73 0.40 0.73 19 Hamragarðaheiði 0.73 0.41 0.75 42 (Figure 13). As in case with the Katla tephra the SEM imaging was carried out to visually demonstrate the grain shapes. More images can be seen in Þorsteins- dóttir (2015). DISCUSSION Changes with distance along axes of thickness There is prominent difference in the mean grain size and the proportion of the fine material in the tephra layers from these two volcanoes. At similar distances from their source the Hekla 1947 tephra is much coarser-grained than the Katla SILK-LN tephra (Fig- ure 14). The mean grain size of the SILK-LN tephra changes fairly regularly with distance but varies within bedded layers. The mean grain size of the finer bottom units is halved every 70–75 km and that of the coarser units every 20–22 km. The mean grain size of Hekla 1947 does however change much more with distance and is halved every 13–14 km, as expressed in the bulk samples. There is much more fine material in the Katla tephra than in the Hekla tephra (Figure 15). The range in proportion of fines ≤4 Φ (≤0.063 mm) is 24 to 43 Wt% at distances between 22 and 65 km in the SILK- LN tephra (samples from axis of thickness) but in the Hekla tephra this proportion is 1 to 33 Wt% at the same distance (excluding samples within 19 km dis- tance because no Katla tephra could be obtained at that distance and also potentially remobilized sam- ples). It is interesting that the changes in proportion of fine material ≤6.5 Φ (≤0.011 mm) with distance in the Katla tephra are little to none (Figure 8). Possible reasons for little to no change with distance in grains ≤6.5 Φ (≤0.011 mm) can be aggregation or scaveng- ing by or adhesion to larger grains. The main differences in grain size between the SILK-LN and the Hekla 1947 tephra can be summed up in the following way: The Hekla 1947 tephra has significantly higher mean grain size and much lower content of material ≤4 Φ (≤0.063 mm) at all distances than in the SILK-LN tephra. The mean grain size of Hekla 1947 decreases more rapidly with distance than that of the SILK-LN tephra. The higher mean grain size and lower content of fine material in the Hekla- 1947 tephra compared to SILK-LN tephra is thought to be connected to environmental conditions. Katla is covered in ice and Hekla is situated in a dry area. The interaction between water and magma in Katla eruptions can produce extremely fine grained tephra which explains the high amount of fines and lower mean grain size in the Katla tephra (e.g. Morrisey et al., 2000; White and Houghton, 2000; Zimanowski et al., 1997; Wohletz, 1983). Mean grain size will also decrease more slowly with distance in the case of SILK-LN due to high proportion of fines with lower terminal velocity and longer travel range, as compared to the more coarse grained Hekla 1947. Changes with time The grain size measurements of the SILK-LN tephra show an evolution from finer grained material in the beginning toward a coarser grained material in the latter part of the eruption (e.g. Figure 6). Where the tephra was bedded the proportion of fine ash de- creased from ca. 30–43 Wt% in the bottom unit to ca. 11–29 Wt% in the top unit. A possible reason for finer grained tephra in the beginning phase of the eruption could be due to in- creased fragmentation caused by optimal availability of external water and the fact that SILK-LN tephra layer is high in SiO2. The large amount of fine ash is JÖKULL No. 65, 2015 41
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120

x

Jökull

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.