Studia Islandica - 01.07.1966, Side 61

Studia Islandica - 01.07.1966, Side 61
59 fered substantially from that which survives. It is in ac- cordance with what we know of Snorri’s methods that he should omit everything in the story that had no bearing on his immediate purpose: it would have been surprising if he had kept such episodes as King Óláfr’s dream and the boast- ing episode in such a work as his Óláfs saga. On the other hand it is difficult to imagine that RauSúlfs þáttr can ever have lacked these episodes, for there is little point in the story without them. The conventional “frame” story is obviously only the excuse for the much more interesting episodes of the boasting and the dream, which were clearly the author’s main interest. These are not merely decorative motives that that could have been added afterwards, for they are the centre of the story. It is therefore unlikely that the version of the story known to Snorri lacked any of the episodes in the extant version.1 Snorri has added nothing to the details he found in Rauð- úlfs þáttr. But he has made some changes. He has altered the order of events, making Rauðúlfr tell the king about his family history immediately after the king’s arrival at his home; and putting Rauðúlfr’s sons’ statement of their ac- complishments immediately after this. The compression of the story has also resulted in the testing of these boasts ap- parently taking place at the same time, instead of the next day as in the þáttr. Another change Snorri has made is the transference of Rauðúlfr’s accomplishment (the ability to interpret dreams) to his son Sigurðr, who is therefore given two accomplishments.2 All specific references to Rauðúlfr’s accomplishments Snorri has omitted. His third change is the most significant. In RaúSúlfs þáttr, when the king asks Dagr (in order to test his boast) what defect he can see in his 1 Cf. Sigurður Nordal, Om Olaf den helliges Saga (Kobenhavn 1914), pp. 86—88. A contrary opinion was expressed by Finnur Jónsson, Den oldnorske og oldislandske Litteraturs Historie (Kobenhavn 1894— 1902), II 645, III 90. 2 See p. 71 below. Many of Snorri’s changes have influenced later redactors of the text of RauSúlfs þáttr, see below pp. 71—75.

x

Studia Islandica

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Studia Islandica
https://timarit.is/publication/1542

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.