AVS. Arkitektúr verktækni skipulag - 01.06.2003, Blaðsíða 35

AVS. Arkitektúr verktækni skipulag - 01.06.2003, Blaðsíða 35
of the city and those taking part in its planning coming to terms with the city as it is and also try in a properly conscious way to mend holes in the townscape. From the middle of the eighties of the last century, the timber build- ings of Reykjavík have began to be justly appreciated and the same can now be said of con- crete buildings from the first decades of the last century. Recently, emphasis has been put on recreating the old streetscape of Reykjavík - as on Aðalstræti. However, is it justifiable to relo- cate old tímber buildings within the city to create a more „com- plete" streetscape or a street resembling the original as much as possible? Are we not in this way guilty of imitating the old townscape and hindering natural development of the townscape of today? This is, of course, always a question of one’s viewpoint or whether one looks at the par- ticular or the whole and the rela- tionships created in a built area during a long period. According to Rossi, the idea of permanence appears in the endeavour to preserve typical parts within the whole, for exam- ple, that housing areas keep their appearance although the activi- ties have changed. This can especially be seen in Reykjavík, where an old and historically important timber buílding now houses a sushi restaurant, hous- es on Kirkjustræti have been con- verted into offices for Parliament members, and an old women’s school has been turned into an entertainment area. Despite changes in land use, the district retains its character. Reference to the past The city as a whole is a phenom- enon containing the common memories of the inhabitants. The idea of the historic form contains a certain development of history, which appears in forms connect- ed to the past without recreating, but rather as reference to the past. Rossi used simplified forms, which refer to the past and to the common memories of mankind, forms that are so neutral that they do not disturb but evoke certain feelings or memories. In this way, architecture becomes kind of backdrop for society and its development. To make this flow between the past and the present as natural as possible there must be cohesion of form, materials and methods. Rossi maintained that the connection between the past and the future was manifest in idea of the city and that this connection took place in the same way as memory influences the individual and his thought. The history and the memory of the city are maintained in many aspects, not only in buildings, not only in history and historic writing. It is contained, as Aldo Rossi would say, in the common con- sciousness of the inhabitants and the city is renewed every day through the experiences of each and every one, whether they are positive or negative. By encom- passing one’s past without becoming too occupied with it or even denying it as many modernists did during the middle of the last century, it is possible to ensure that future development and all new creation go hand in hand with the passing of time. ■ 1 Rossi, Aldo. The Architecture of the City. Oppositons Books. MIT Press 1999 (1982) 2 Rossi, Aldo. The Architecture of the City, bls.7 3 Rossi, Aldo. The Architecture of the City, bls. 7 (own translation) („History exist so long as an object is in use;that is, so long as a form relates to its original function. However, when form and function are servered, and only form remains vital, history shifts into the realm of memory. “) 33
Blaðsíða 1
Blaðsíða 2
Blaðsíða 3
Blaðsíða 4
Blaðsíða 5
Blaðsíða 6
Blaðsíða 7
Blaðsíða 8
Blaðsíða 9
Blaðsíða 10
Blaðsíða 11
Blaðsíða 12
Blaðsíða 13
Blaðsíða 14
Blaðsíða 15
Blaðsíða 16
Blaðsíða 17
Blaðsíða 18
Blaðsíða 19
Blaðsíða 20
Blaðsíða 21
Blaðsíða 22
Blaðsíða 23
Blaðsíða 24
Blaðsíða 25
Blaðsíða 26
Blaðsíða 27
Blaðsíða 28
Blaðsíða 29
Blaðsíða 30
Blaðsíða 31
Blaðsíða 32
Blaðsíða 33
Blaðsíða 34
Blaðsíða 35
Blaðsíða 36
Blaðsíða 37
Blaðsíða 38
Blaðsíða 39
Blaðsíða 40
Blaðsíða 41
Blaðsíða 42
Blaðsíða 43
Blaðsíða 44
Blaðsíða 45
Blaðsíða 46
Blaðsíða 47
Blaðsíða 48
Blaðsíða 49
Blaðsíða 50
Blaðsíða 51
Blaðsíða 52
Blaðsíða 53
Blaðsíða 54
Blaðsíða 55
Blaðsíða 56
Blaðsíða 57
Blaðsíða 58
Blaðsíða 59
Blaðsíða 60
Blaðsíða 61
Blaðsíða 62
Blaðsíða 63
Blaðsíða 64
Blaðsíða 65
Blaðsíða 66
Blaðsíða 67
Blaðsíða 68
Blaðsíða 69
Blaðsíða 70
Blaðsíða 71
Blaðsíða 72
Blaðsíða 73
Blaðsíða 74
Blaðsíða 75
Blaðsíða 76
Blaðsíða 77
Blaðsíða 78
Blaðsíða 79
Blaðsíða 80
Blaðsíða 81
Blaðsíða 82
Blaðsíða 83
Blaðsíða 84

x

AVS. Arkitektúr verktækni skipulag

Beinir tenglar

Ef þú vilt tengja á þennan titil, vinsamlegast notaðu þessa tengla:

Tengja á þennan titil: AVS. Arkitektúr verktækni skipulag
https://timarit.is/publication/1784

Tengja á þetta tölublað:

Tengja á þessa síðu:

Tengja á þessa grein:

Vinsamlegast ekki tengja beint á myndir eða PDF skjöl á Tímarit.is þar sem slíkar slóðir geta breyst án fyrirvara. Notið slóðirnar hér fyrir ofan til að tengja á vefinn.