AVS. Arkitektúr verktækni skipulag - 01.12.2004, Blaðsíða 47

AVS. Arkitektúr verktækni skipulag - 01.12.2004, Blaðsíða 47
The environment of Reykjavlk has changed a great deal since the middle of the 60s when I returned from my studies abroad. At that time I had a wetsuit and oxygen containers and dove for mussels in Straumsvlk, Hvalfjörður and other places. Often we went hiking on the hills above Ferstikla, along the old Þingvalla-road, to the Hengill- valleys on Hellis-heath, along the Skarðsmýrar-mountain, above Kolviðar-hill and on the Vatnsleysa- coast. These places are no longer inviting for outdoor recreation. Power works, high-voltage towers, speed-roads and metal smelters dominate the environment in almost all these areas. And everything indicates that the impact of heavy industry in this area is far from over. The R-party in Reykjavik promised first that the electric power works at Nesjavellir would be used to lower the price of electricity in Reykjavik. Instead that electricity went to the smelter, Norðurál for a price below the market. During the still weather last summer it was reported in the news that air pollution in Reykjavik was near- ing danger limits. Sulphur pollution in the area from Grundartangi to Straumsvik will almost double in the near future. This is a result of the intended enlargement of Norðurál, the permitted enlargement of ÍSAL and the intended electric termi- nal factory in Katanes. It can be expected that this will result in dan- gerous levels of air pollution in this area. The gas, sulphur oxide (SO2) causes air pollution and acid rain. According to information on the web of the Statistical Bureau of lceland the total emission from human activities of SO2 in lceland was 9,8 thousand tons in 2002. In compari- son the yearly emission of SO2 in Denmark is 28 thousand tons, in Norway 26 t.t., in Sweden, 56 t.t., and in Finland 74 thousand tons. Permitted increase of SO2 emission in the enlargement of the aluminium smelter at Grundartangi is 1,7 thousand tons, Reyðarál 4,1 t.t., with 0,7 thousand tons from the elec- tric terminal factory. This increase totals 10,4 thousand tons and the total yearly emission in lceland of SO2 will then be 20,2 thousand tons and getting close to the total emission of Denmark and Norway. Most of this emission takes part in the area from Straumsvík to Hvalfjörður. I have tried to obtain information about the log term effects of this emission on people, animals and plants but with no results. One has to pose the question, what interests are being served by this irresponsible development? The real benefits from this heavy industry go to the owners abroad. The return on investment in the power plants is low. The jobs created are few compared to the investment in the infrastructure. But why is this then being done? The answer is obvi- ous. The State, Landsvirkjun and the local authorities are the greatest employers of all engineers, natural scientists, geologists, archaeologists etc. If any of these people object to these policies they are simply „put on ice“. The same applies to contractors who have to obtain new and new work. The momentum of all these interests is so strong that it can only be stopped by a long term change in policies and atti- tudes. One action would, however, result in a dramatic change fit for today. Privatise the State Power Company (Landsvirkjun). Then these hazardous and not very profitable power works would immediately be stopped and the country left in peace. The present day power plant policy could be likened to the folk tale: „Neyttu á meðan á nefinu sten- dur.“ The power-plant woman says „Someone in the kingdom is still shouting". „Who are they calling and why? asks her husband. „They are calling for me to hold a baby at a christening", says his wife. „Go then“ says her husband. Everything now indicates that the power-plant folk tale will end as the above folk tale. The butter will be finished and husband knocked out. ■ avs 47
Blaðsíða 1
Blaðsíða 2
Blaðsíða 3
Blaðsíða 4
Blaðsíða 5
Blaðsíða 6
Blaðsíða 7
Blaðsíða 8
Blaðsíða 9
Blaðsíða 10
Blaðsíða 11
Blaðsíða 12
Blaðsíða 13
Blaðsíða 14
Blaðsíða 15
Blaðsíða 16
Blaðsíða 17
Blaðsíða 18
Blaðsíða 19
Blaðsíða 20
Blaðsíða 21
Blaðsíða 22
Blaðsíða 23
Blaðsíða 24
Blaðsíða 25
Blaðsíða 26
Blaðsíða 27
Blaðsíða 28
Blaðsíða 29
Blaðsíða 30
Blaðsíða 31
Blaðsíða 32
Blaðsíða 33
Blaðsíða 34
Blaðsíða 35
Blaðsíða 36
Blaðsíða 37
Blaðsíða 38
Blaðsíða 39
Blaðsíða 40
Blaðsíða 41
Blaðsíða 42
Blaðsíða 43
Blaðsíða 44
Blaðsíða 45
Blaðsíða 46
Blaðsíða 47
Blaðsíða 48
Blaðsíða 49
Blaðsíða 50
Blaðsíða 51
Blaðsíða 52
Blaðsíða 53
Blaðsíða 54
Blaðsíða 55
Blaðsíða 56
Blaðsíða 57
Blaðsíða 58
Blaðsíða 59
Blaðsíða 60
Blaðsíða 61
Blaðsíða 62
Blaðsíða 63
Blaðsíða 64
Blaðsíða 65
Blaðsíða 66
Blaðsíða 67
Blaðsíða 68

x

AVS. Arkitektúr verktækni skipulag

Beinir tenglar

Ef þú vilt tengja á þennan titil, vinsamlegast notaðu þessa tengla:

Tengja á þennan titil: AVS. Arkitektúr verktækni skipulag
https://timarit.is/publication/1784

Tengja á þetta tölublað:

Tengja á þessa síðu:

Tengja á þessa grein:

Vinsamlegast ekki tengja beint á myndir eða PDF skjöl á Tímarit.is þar sem slíkar slóðir geta breyst án fyrirvara. Notið slóðirnar hér fyrir ofan til að tengja á vefinn.