Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.2007, Page 119

Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.2007, Page 119
GRÓÐURIN Á FLAGTEKJUM í FØROYUM OG Á GRASLENDINUM UTTANUM - EIN KANNING ÚR SANDOYNNI 117 more typically, birch (Betula spp.) bark was imported from Norway and placed be- neath the turfs to provide a waterproof layer (Taylor, 1997). Constructed in this way the turf roofs would remain servicea- ble for 40 to 60 years whereas the barley thatch would be renewed at more regular intervals of 4-5 years (Stanley in West 1976). At the start of the twentieth century, Os- tenfeld (1905-1908, p. 1012) observed, “that nearly all the Færoese houses are thatched with turf.” By the middle of the century, Williamson (1948) obseiwed the removal of turfs from the roofs in Koltur and their replacement with asbestos sheets. This replacement of turf by more modern materials has continued throughout the Faroes, so that by the end of the twentieth century only outbuildings and occasional modem houses were roofed in such a way (cf. Hansen and Jóhansen, 1982). How- ever, with a few exceptions (e.g. Dúvugar- dur museum in Saksun), the traditional ap- pearance of these remaining roofs belies their more modern mode of construction that incorporates plastic sheeting in place of the more traditional birch bark (næver). The species composition of the turfs initially reflects that of the vegetation it is removed from, usually within the outfíeld or hagi (Ostenfeld, 1905-08). Attention has been drawn to the decreasing plant diver- sity of the turfs once they are lain upon the roof and this has been presumed to be a consequence of summer drought condi- tions favouring a predominance of grasses over the other phanerogams and associated cryptogams (Lyngbye, 1822; Ostenfeld, 1905-08; Hansen, 1966; Hansen and Jó- hansen, 1982). In some cases, the vigorous growth of the grasses could be harvested to supply hay (Hansen and Jóhansen, 1982) and chickens would also exploit the roofs as they searched for food (Williamson, 1948). The grass species prevalent on the roofs are those that are best able to tolerate the presumed limiting factor of summer drought, such as Anthoxanthum odoratum, Festuca rubra var. fratercula and Poa triv- ialis (Jóhansen, 1985). While some or all of these taxa may have lieen present in the vegetation of the original turf, and it may have been chosen for this reason, it was a common practice to collect seeds or grown plants of desirable species for incorpora- tion into the roof. F. rubra var. fratercula or Poa trivialis were especially favoured, pre- sumably because of the waterproofing pro- vided by the long, procumbent and “flow- ing” habit of the leaves of these grasses. Aims and hypotheses The first aim of this paper is to offer some observations and data on an interesting as- pect of traditional Faroese building that is currently in the process of becoming lost to more modem materials and methods. ln so far as the data sets allow, the paper also in- tends to test three hypotheses concerning the lower species diversity of the roof turfs in comparison to the ground vegetation from which they were probably derived: Hypothesis one: there is a reduction of species diversity due to summer drought conditions (this was proposed informally
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212

x

Fróðskaparrit

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Fróðskaparrit
https://timarit.is/publication/15

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.