Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.2007, Page 160

Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.2007, Page 160
158 SOFT BOTTOM MACRO FAUNA SPECIES COMPOSITION IN FAROESE FJORDS tion in Skálaijørður and compared the re- sults witli Nørrevang (1990). Sakarisson (2000) reported on benthic invertebrates in Faroese sillijords. Josefson (2001) com- pared two sites on the Faroese shelf. Species richness and abundance Species numbers ranged from 5 to 66 but both numbers must be considered extre- mes. The low number was from sandy sed- iments with low organic content and the high number was from very mixed sedi- ments. From Figure 2a an estimated nor- mal range for species numbers seems to be about 20 to 45. Stations with species num- bers below 20 are mostly from a single lo- cality (Sandur) with sand/pebble sediments and very low organic content (11-14%). Four stations show distinctly higher spe- cies numbers than the rest. These are also from sand/pebble sediments but with a slightly higher organic content. Thc lowest number of individuals was 8 and the high- est 1655. The low numbers are from the same stations which also have the lowest species numbers (Sandur). The samples with the highest numbers of individuals are from samples 7R and 7S which are from a depth of only six meters in Fuglafjørður. These two samples have a very distinct domination of Polydora ciliata and are clearly deviant from the other samples. This species is highly opportunistic (Gray, 1979) and high numbers of individuals can be produced within a short time. Diversity measures The abundance ratio (ratio between num- ber of individuals in a sample and the species number in the same sample) was between 1.3 and 20.6 with an average value 7.7. In organically enriched sedi- ments the abundance ratio increases with moderately higher levels of organic mate- rials in the sediment (Pearson et al., 1986). This is particularly interesting as it can be used as a quick and easy method to decide if sediments are under influence of organic enrichment. From Table 1 it can be seen that the average abundance ratio (3.8) in- creases from the low ignition loss group (<30 mg/kg) to 7.7 and 10.5 in the higher groups (30-60 mg/kg and >60 mg/kg re- spectively). The average Shannon index was 3.5 with little variance between the different sediment types, depth and organic content in sediment. The lowest numbers were 2.0 and the highest 5.2. Shannon diversity is widely used as a measure to evaluate changes to benthic communities due to or- ganic enrichment. In most cases the Shan- non diversity is expected to decrease with increasing organic enrichment. From Table 1 it seems like low organic content in the sediment has a low Shannon index (2.5) compared to the groups with higher or- ganic content (3.7 and 3.4). This could be explained as a low energy environment will respond positively with additional species with moderately increased organic enrichment but will fall towards zero with further enrichment. Pearson et al. (1986) showed the same tendency from Firth of Clyde (Scotland). The Shannon index should therefore be used with caution in evaluation of change in benthic communi- ties.
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212

x

Fróðskaparrit

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Fróðskaparrit
https://timarit.is/publication/15

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.