Jökull


Jökull - 01.12.1977, Page 18

Jökull - 01.12.1977, Page 18
TABLE III (continued) Bb 465 N = 4 X ± Bb 480b N = 5 X ± Bb 483 N = 4 xT ± Bb 483 N = 8 X ± Bb 483x N = 4 X ± SÍ02 49.00 1.04 49.86 .37 50.20 .62 76.24 1.76 49.50 1.00 ALOa 13.79 .22 13.53 .12 13.65 .10 11.97 .50 13.32 .21 TiOo 1.75 .11 1.52 .04 1.82 .06 .30 .06 3.00 .24 FeO* 12.44 .46 11.41 .38 12.36 .10 2.85 .45 14.02 .40 MnO .20 .01 .20 .05 .23 .05 .08 .07 .25 .07 MgO 6.52 .48 8.46 .23 7.79 .13 .17 .08 6.21 .24 CaO 12.18 1.20 12.16 .19 11.46 .32 1.41 .23 9.86 .54 Na20 2.51 .45 2.56 .11 2.56 .13 .88 .30 2.77 .17 KoO .26 .12 .24 .02 .23 .04 1.64 .18 .46 .03 P2O5 .18 .05 .18 .03 .18 .07 .06 .05 .31 .06 98.83 100.12 100.48 95.60 99.70 Bb 483x N = 3 X ± Bb N = X 484 = 4 S.D. Bb N = X 486 = 6 Bb 490 N = 4 X ± Bb 492 N = 6 X ± Si02 50.56 .70 51.03 .82 49.23 1.02 49.50 .44 48.95 .55 AI2O3 13.93 .20 14.37 .20 13.56 .29 13.56 .38 13.58 .40 TiOo 1.80 .06 1.66 .03 1.71 .10 1.69 .05 1.69 .06 FeO* 12.60 .20 12.26 .35 12.04 .52 12.07 1.45 12.31 .26 MnO .21 .02 .20 .02 .22 .06 .24 .04 .26 .23 MgO 7.74 .10 6.69 .44 6.67 .13 6.37 .47 6.71 .14 CaO 11.36 .19 11.23 .75 12.04 .10 11.65 .78 12.04 .23 Na20 2.61 .07 2.61 .10 2.40 .11 2.34 .09 2.36 .06 K»0 .23 .03 .18 .08 .25 .03 .24 .06 .26 .06 P2O5 .20 .04 .13 .03 .17 .02 .16 .04 .18 .02 101.24 100.36 98.29 97.82 98.34 may be íormed in eruptions hitherto unrecord- ed, in the regions west to northeast o£ Bárdar- bunga. However, in view o£ the Kv? 1477 ana- lysis (Table II, no. 12) it seems likely that some of the tephras £rom the period between 1650 and 1730 may be front Kverkfjöll. The next few years will see much new chemi- cal clata on known tephras in Iceland, procured with the microprobe, but so far little work has Ireen done along these lines beyond that pre- sented here. One aspect, which has to be tested, ] 6 JÖKULL 27. ÁR is the question of the homogeneity (or other- wise) of the products of the various volcanoes. Finally, in Table II, 12 analyses are given for comparison representing known volcanoes that cover the range in chemical characteristics observed in the Bárdarbunga samples. The ana- lyr.es are plotted for comparison in Fig. 6. Clear- ly tlie 12 analyses sliow greater scatter than do tlic microprobe glass analyses — it is as if they represent various mixtures of the “pure compon- ents”.
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116

x

Jökull

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.