Jökull


Jökull - 01.12.1977, Side 21

Jökull - 01.12.1977, Side 21
tion, but no counterpart in a known eruption or jökulhlaup, could be tlie result o£ an erup- tion in Grímsvötn that failed to trigger a jökul- hlaup. In 1854 the caldera was but slightly recovered after the hlaup of 1851. The next jökulhlaup to follow, possibly accompanied by a minor eruption, occurred in 1861, resulting in a repose time of 7 years. During the 17th, 18th and 19th centuries the period of repose for Grímsvötn eruptions ranged, when known, between 5 and 12 years, 9 to 10 years being the most common (6 out of 11 instances in the range 5 or 12 years; Thorarinsson 1974, p. 224). The fotir missing Grimsvötn tephras are G 1873, G 1867, G 1861, and G 1684-85. Tliree of the four belong to “certain” eruptions — what causes their non-appearance is uncertain, but it seems remarkable that three of the four missing layers belong to consecutive eruptions — i.e. all tephras from known eruptions in the period from 1838 to 1875 are missing, and the only layer that appears is the unknown one of 1854. In general, a protracted north wind during a Grímsvötn eruption would prevent the tephra from reaching Bárdarbunga. Likewise, the re- distribution of the tephra into dunes might cause the drill to miss certain layers. When dry, volcanic ash is blown about easily by the wind just like snow. In this connection it is of interest to note the non-appearance (according to the present interpretation) of the 1903 tephra from hórdarhyrna, a sample of which was collected aboard a ship off Langanes NE of Iceland (Mouritzen & Noe-Nygaard 1950), but whose main observed bulk fell farther south, on the highlands between Jökuldalur and Vopnafjörd- ur (Thorarinsson 1974, p. 121). It seems very I ikely that some of this tephra fell on Bárdar- bunga, but subsecjuently was blown into drifts. Lhe I> 1903 eruption, therefore, affords an in- stance where an ash layer jjrobably jrresent is missed by the drill. G 1873: More tephra fell as a result of this cruption than known with certainty for any other Grímsvötn eruption. This applies especial- ly for the three-day period from the 9th to the Gth of January (1873). On the morning of the Oth the volcanic cloucl must have far exceeded 10 km in height. Most of the tephra was carried to the SE, but on the lOth fine ash fell both in Eyjafjördur and Thingeyjarsýsla, in direction across Bárdarbunga (Thorarinsson 1974, p. 91). This tephra should, therefore, have been de- jrosited there. G 1867: In the 1867 eruption very little tephra fall was observed, and only in the regions south of Vatnajökull (Thorarinsson op. cit., pp. 80— 81). G 1861: A major jökulhlaup occurred in Skeid- ará in 1861, and Thorarinsson (op. cit., p. 78) states that a “minor eruption may have accom- panied the jökulhlaup”. In view of the non- appearance of tephras such as the G 1873 one, the present evidence is inconclusive as to the question whether an eruption took place in 1861 or not, and in fact Thorarinsson (1978, pers. comm.) considers it highly improbable. G 1684—85: According to contemporary sources an erujrtion occurred in Vatnajökull in 1685, and jökulhlaups took place in the winter of 1684—85 both in Skeidará and Jökulsá. Prob- ably this was the result of eruptions in Kverk- fjöll or Dyngjufjöll, and in Grímsvötn (Thor- arinsson ojr. cit., pp. 52—53). Indeed, the 25- meter ashless stretch towards the bottom of the drill liole is curious, representing, as it does, almost 40 years in time. Kverkfjöll Two tephras in the Bárdarbunga core corre- spond in time with jökulhlaups in Jökulsá á Fjöllum, Kv 1711 and Kv 1717, the latter one as a result o£ a described major eruption in Vatnajökull. Chemically both tejrhras are oli- vine tholeiite, comparable to layer “a” (Kverk- fjöll ? 1477, Table II no. 12). As mentioned earlier Thorarinsson (1950) regarded most o£ the six hlaups occurring in Jökulsá between 1655 and 1729 volcanogenic. At least two of these (i.e. 1684 ancl 1716) were associated witli eruptions in Grímsvötn — curiously enough hlaups in Jökulsá often coincide with eruptions in Grímsvötn (e.g. in 1934, Thorarinsson 1950). Tlie remaining hlaups, in 1726 and 1729, are not represented in the core. JÖKULL 27. ÁR 19
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116

x

Jökull

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.