Jökull


Jökull - 01.12.1977, Page 21

Jökull - 01.12.1977, Page 21
tion, but no counterpart in a known eruption or jökulhlaup, could be tlie result o£ an erup- tion in Grímsvötn that failed to trigger a jökul- hlaup. In 1854 the caldera was but slightly recovered after the hlaup of 1851. The next jökulhlaup to follow, possibly accompanied by a minor eruption, occurred in 1861, resulting in a repose time of 7 years. During the 17th, 18th and 19th centuries the period of repose for Grímsvötn eruptions ranged, when known, between 5 and 12 years, 9 to 10 years being the most common (6 out of 11 instances in the range 5 or 12 years; Thorarinsson 1974, p. 224). The fotir missing Grimsvötn tephras are G 1873, G 1867, G 1861, and G 1684-85. Tliree of the four belong to “certain” eruptions — what causes their non-appearance is uncertain, but it seems remarkable that three of the four missing layers belong to consecutive eruptions — i.e. all tephras from known eruptions in the period from 1838 to 1875 are missing, and the only layer that appears is the unknown one of 1854. In general, a protracted north wind during a Grímsvötn eruption would prevent the tephra from reaching Bárdarbunga. Likewise, the re- distribution of the tephra into dunes might cause the drill to miss certain layers. When dry, volcanic ash is blown about easily by the wind just like snow. In this connection it is of interest to note the non-appearance (according to the present interpretation) of the 1903 tephra from hórdarhyrna, a sample of which was collected aboard a ship off Langanes NE of Iceland (Mouritzen & Noe-Nygaard 1950), but whose main observed bulk fell farther south, on the highlands between Jökuldalur and Vopnafjörd- ur (Thorarinsson 1974, p. 121). It seems very I ikely that some of this tephra fell on Bárdar- bunga, but subsecjuently was blown into drifts. Lhe I> 1903 eruption, therefore, affords an in- stance where an ash layer jjrobably jrresent is missed by the drill. G 1873: More tephra fell as a result of this cruption than known with certainty for any other Grímsvötn eruption. This applies especial- ly for the three-day period from the 9th to the Gth of January (1873). On the morning of the Oth the volcanic cloucl must have far exceeded 10 km in height. Most of the tephra was carried to the SE, but on the lOth fine ash fell both in Eyjafjördur and Thingeyjarsýsla, in direction across Bárdarbunga (Thorarinsson 1974, p. 91). This tephra should, therefore, have been de- jrosited there. G 1867: In the 1867 eruption very little tephra fall was observed, and only in the regions south of Vatnajökull (Thorarinsson op. cit., pp. 80— 81). G 1861: A major jökulhlaup occurred in Skeid- ará in 1861, and Thorarinsson (op. cit., p. 78) states that a “minor eruption may have accom- panied the jökulhlaup”. In view of the non- appearance of tephras such as the G 1873 one, the present evidence is inconclusive as to the question whether an eruption took place in 1861 or not, and in fact Thorarinsson (1978, pers. comm.) considers it highly improbable. G 1684—85: According to contemporary sources an erujrtion occurred in Vatnajökull in 1685, and jökulhlaups took place in the winter of 1684—85 both in Skeidará and Jökulsá. Prob- ably this was the result of eruptions in Kverk- fjöll or Dyngjufjöll, and in Grímsvötn (Thor- arinsson ojr. cit., pp. 52—53). Indeed, the 25- meter ashless stretch towards the bottom of the drill liole is curious, representing, as it does, almost 40 years in time. Kverkfjöll Two tephras in the Bárdarbunga core corre- spond in time with jökulhlaups in Jökulsá á Fjöllum, Kv 1711 and Kv 1717, the latter one as a result o£ a described major eruption in Vatnajökull. Chemically both tejrhras are oli- vine tholeiite, comparable to layer “a” (Kverk- fjöll ? 1477, Table II no. 12). As mentioned earlier Thorarinsson (1950) regarded most o£ the six hlaups occurring in Jökulsá between 1655 and 1729 volcanogenic. At least two of these (i.e. 1684 ancl 1716) were associated witli eruptions in Grímsvötn — curiously enough hlaups in Jökulsá often coincide with eruptions in Grímsvötn (e.g. in 1934, Thorarinsson 1950). Tlie remaining hlaups, in 1726 and 1729, are not represented in the core. JÖKULL 27. ÁR 19
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116

x

Jökull

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.