Jökull


Jökull - 01.12.1977, Síða 21

Jökull - 01.12.1977, Síða 21
tion, but no counterpart in a known eruption or jökulhlaup, could be tlie result o£ an erup- tion in Grímsvötn that failed to trigger a jökul- hlaup. In 1854 the caldera was but slightly recovered after the hlaup of 1851. The next jökulhlaup to follow, possibly accompanied by a minor eruption, occurred in 1861, resulting in a repose time of 7 years. During the 17th, 18th and 19th centuries the period of repose for Grímsvötn eruptions ranged, when known, between 5 and 12 years, 9 to 10 years being the most common (6 out of 11 instances in the range 5 or 12 years; Thorarinsson 1974, p. 224). The fotir missing Grimsvötn tephras are G 1873, G 1867, G 1861, and G 1684-85. Tliree of the four belong to “certain” eruptions — what causes their non-appearance is uncertain, but it seems remarkable that three of the four missing layers belong to consecutive eruptions — i.e. all tephras from known eruptions in the period from 1838 to 1875 are missing, and the only layer that appears is the unknown one of 1854. In general, a protracted north wind during a Grímsvötn eruption would prevent the tephra from reaching Bárdarbunga. Likewise, the re- distribution of the tephra into dunes might cause the drill to miss certain layers. When dry, volcanic ash is blown about easily by the wind just like snow. In this connection it is of interest to note the non-appearance (according to the present interpretation) of the 1903 tephra from hórdarhyrna, a sample of which was collected aboard a ship off Langanes NE of Iceland (Mouritzen & Noe-Nygaard 1950), but whose main observed bulk fell farther south, on the highlands between Jökuldalur and Vopnafjörd- ur (Thorarinsson 1974, p. 121). It seems very I ikely that some of this tephra fell on Bárdar- bunga, but subsecjuently was blown into drifts. Lhe I> 1903 eruption, therefore, affords an in- stance where an ash layer jjrobably jrresent is missed by the drill. G 1873: More tephra fell as a result of this cruption than known with certainty for any other Grímsvötn eruption. This applies especial- ly for the three-day period from the 9th to the Gth of January (1873). On the morning of the Oth the volcanic cloucl must have far exceeded 10 km in height. Most of the tephra was carried to the SE, but on the lOth fine ash fell both in Eyjafjördur and Thingeyjarsýsla, in direction across Bárdarbunga (Thorarinsson 1974, p. 91). This tephra should, therefore, have been de- jrosited there. G 1867: In the 1867 eruption very little tephra fall was observed, and only in the regions south of Vatnajökull (Thorarinsson op. cit., pp. 80— 81). G 1861: A major jökulhlaup occurred in Skeid- ará in 1861, and Thorarinsson (op. cit., p. 78) states that a “minor eruption may have accom- panied the jökulhlaup”. In view of the non- appearance of tephras such as the G 1873 one, the present evidence is inconclusive as to the question whether an eruption took place in 1861 or not, and in fact Thorarinsson (1978, pers. comm.) considers it highly improbable. G 1684—85: According to contemporary sources an erujrtion occurred in Vatnajökull in 1685, and jökulhlaups took place in the winter of 1684—85 both in Skeidará and Jökulsá. Prob- ably this was the result of eruptions in Kverk- fjöll or Dyngjufjöll, and in Grímsvötn (Thor- arinsson ojr. cit., pp. 52—53). Indeed, the 25- meter ashless stretch towards the bottom of the drill liole is curious, representing, as it does, almost 40 years in time. Kverkfjöll Two tephras in the Bárdarbunga core corre- spond in time with jökulhlaups in Jökulsá á Fjöllum, Kv 1711 and Kv 1717, the latter one as a result o£ a described major eruption in Vatnajökull. Chemically both tejrhras are oli- vine tholeiite, comparable to layer “a” (Kverk- fjöll ? 1477, Table II no. 12). As mentioned earlier Thorarinsson (1950) regarded most o£ the six hlaups occurring in Jökulsá between 1655 and 1729 volcanogenic. At least two of these (i.e. 1684 ancl 1716) were associated witli eruptions in Grímsvötn — curiously enough hlaups in Jökulsá often coincide with eruptions in Grímsvötn (e.g. in 1934, Thorarinsson 1950). Tlie remaining hlaups, in 1726 and 1729, are not represented in the core. JÖKULL 27. ÁR 19
Síða 1
Síða 2
Síða 3
Síða 4
Síða 5
Síða 6
Síða 7
Síða 8
Síða 9
Síða 10
Síða 11
Síða 12
Síða 13
Síða 14
Síða 15
Síða 16
Síða 17
Síða 18
Síða 19
Síða 20
Síða 21
Síða 22
Síða 23
Síða 24
Síða 25
Síða 26
Síða 27
Síða 28
Síða 29
Síða 30
Síða 31
Síða 32
Síða 33
Síða 34
Síða 35
Síða 36
Síða 37
Síða 38
Síða 39
Síða 40
Síða 41
Síða 42
Síða 43
Síða 44
Síða 45
Síða 46
Síða 47
Síða 48
Síða 49
Síða 50
Síða 51
Síða 52
Síða 53
Síða 54
Síða 55
Síða 56
Síða 57
Síða 58
Síða 59
Síða 60
Síða 61
Síða 62
Síða 63
Síða 64
Síða 65
Síða 66
Síða 67
Síða 68
Síða 69
Síða 70
Síða 71
Síða 72
Síða 73
Síða 74
Síða 75
Síða 76
Síða 77
Síða 78
Síða 79
Síða 80
Síða 81
Síða 82
Síða 83
Síða 84
Síða 85
Síða 86
Síða 87
Síða 88
Síða 89
Síða 90
Síða 91
Síða 92
Síða 93
Síða 94
Síða 95
Síða 96
Síða 97
Síða 98
Síða 99
Síða 100
Síða 101
Síða 102
Síða 103
Síða 104
Síða 105
Síða 106
Síða 107
Síða 108
Síða 109
Síða 110
Síða 111
Síða 112
Síða 113
Síða 114
Síða 115
Síða 116

x

Jökull

Beinleiðis leinki

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.