Archaeologia Islandica - 01.01.2005, Side 98

Archaeologia Islandica - 01.01.2005, Side 98
Garðar Guðmundsson, Gavin Lucas, Hildur Gestsdóttir and Sigríður Þorgeirsdóttir Figure 10. Photograph of a coffin of type 1, taken by Johannes Klein, 1898. Jónas Jónasson, writing in the early 20th century, mentions that older coffín types were lantem-shaped (með ljósberalagi) with a pitched roof - by which he is probably referring to Type 3 (Jónasson 1961: 302-3; see also Hugason & Aðalsteinsson 1988). According to Jónasson, Type 1, which is the typical coffin form of the 20th century, was a foreign shape introduced after 1800 but its common usage may only date from the late 19th century. Most early 20th century photographs of coffíns show a Type 1, and an early photograph from 1898 by Johannes Klein also shows a Type 1 coffín(Fig. 10). Otherwise, paint- ings and sketches from the earlier 19th century, all depict single box types. A picture by Edward Dayes from 1836 shows a hexagonal coffín (Type 3, see Fig. 11; Gaimard 1838-52), while one of a funeral at Breiðabólsstaður in Fljótshlíð, also from 1836, shows a pentagonal coffin (although it may be Type 3, viewed from the foot end). Both images show a square white cross painted on the end gable plate. Finally, there is a sketch by V. Foulquiers from 1868, showing a hexagonal coffin of Type 2 (Fig. 12; Nougaret 1868: 118). From these dated pictures and photographs, one might infer that Type 3 is the oldest, dating from the early 19th century, type 2 the second oldest, dating to the later 19th century, and type 1 the youngest, dating from the late 19th and 20th century. Based on such slim data, this sequence is highly equivocal, yet the stratigraphic sequence of coffins at Hólskirkja seemingly bears this out. In the one test pit which contained the most variety and best sequence (TP 7), Types 1 and 2 were high up in the sequence, while Type 3 was the lowest coffin exca- vated. Type 4 has not been identified on any images, but is probably 19th century and most comparable to Type 2. Indeed, perhaps the key chronological shift is a development from an irregular polygon (either pentagon or Type 3 hexagon) with 96
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126

x

Archaeologia Islandica

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Archaeologia Islandica
https://timarit.is/publication/1160

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.