Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.2007, Side 164

Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.2007, Side 164
162 SOFT BOTTOM MACRO FAUNA SPECIES COMPOSITION IN FAROESE FJORDS the others. After a scrutiny of the individu- als from these samples it is obvious that two species are the major contributors to the high N/S ratio, Myriochele sp. and Phoronis sp. These two species are some- times found in very large numbers and have a patchy distribution on the seabed (Oug, 2000). The most abundant species were Myriochele sp„ Phoronis sp, Abra ni- tida, Thyasira spp., Ennucula (Nuculoma) tenuis, Heteromastes filiformis (probably misidentified with Mediomastes firagilis), Chaetozone setosa and Diplocirrus glau- cus. Compared to the present paper Myri- ochele sp„ Phoronis sp. and Ennucula (Nuculoma) tenuis are not among the five most frequent species. The Shannon in- dices for each separate sample were be- tween 1.67 and 3.81 with an average of 2.51 which is clearly lower than the aver- age of 3.5 in this paper. The Pielou even- ness index is also quite low (0.62) com- pared to 0.74 in this paper. A general comparison between the re- sults from Nørrevang (1990) and the pres- ent paper shows lower diversity indices and a higher dominance by a few species. Also the composition of species is a little different. A likely explanation for this dif- ference could be that the sample stations in Nørrevang (1990) were placed in the deep- est parts of the fjords where the organic content of the sediments are high and the oxygen conditions at least in late summer are unfavorable. Jørgensen (1993) sampled five locali- ties in Skálafjørður and analyzed for macrofauna and physical/chemical param- eters. From the data she concluded that the benthic fauna could be separated into three different community types. One shallow water community type on the sill at the fjord entrance, another community type in the deepest part of the ijord and a third community type at the innermost part of the ljord. A total of about 107 different species from 12 different phyla were iden- tified from all stations. Eleven different species were among the five most common species from each station (Table 7). Com- pared with the present paper there are a few species with a common high fre- quency, they are Heteromastes filiformis (probably identical with Mediomastus fra- gilis), Thyasira flexuosa/gouldii and Abra nitida. The average species number per 0.1 m2 was 34 (22-49) and this is a little higher compared to the present paper (Table 1) which was 29 (5-66). The average abun- dance per 0.1 m2 was 814 (361-2293) which is about three times higher com- pared to the present paper (Table 1). The average ratio between number of individu- als and the number of species per sample was 23.8 (9.5-46.8) which also is about three times the value found in this paper (Table 1). If we look at the distribution oí the species number in major taxonomic groups we get the usual picture with a heavy domination of polychaetes, fol- lowed by a distinctly lower number ol molluscs. This is comparable with our fin- dings. Sakarisson (2000) investigated two sta- tions from Skálafjord sampled in 1998 and one station from Kaldbakstjørður sampleđ in 1999. All samples were sampled with 0.1 m2 grab and stations SK05 and SK09
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146
Side 147
Side 148
Side 149
Side 150
Side 151
Side 152
Side 153
Side 154
Side 155
Side 156
Side 157
Side 158
Side 159
Side 160
Side 161
Side 162
Side 163
Side 164
Side 165
Side 166
Side 167
Side 168
Side 169
Side 170
Side 171
Side 172
Side 173
Side 174
Side 175
Side 176
Side 177
Side 178
Side 179
Side 180
Side 181
Side 182
Side 183
Side 184
Side 185
Side 186
Side 187
Side 188
Side 189
Side 190
Side 191
Side 192
Side 193
Side 194
Side 195
Side 196
Side 197
Side 198
Side 199
Side 200
Side 201
Side 202
Side 203
Side 204
Side 205
Side 206
Side 207
Side 208
Side 209
Side 210
Side 211
Side 212

x

Fróðskaparrit

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Fróðskaparrit
https://timarit.is/publication/15

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.