Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.2007, Page 164

Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.2007, Page 164
162 SOFT BOTTOM MACRO FAUNA SPECIES COMPOSITION IN FAROESE FJORDS the others. After a scrutiny of the individu- als from these samples it is obvious that two species are the major contributors to the high N/S ratio, Myriochele sp. and Phoronis sp. These two species are some- times found in very large numbers and have a patchy distribution on the seabed (Oug, 2000). The most abundant species were Myriochele sp„ Phoronis sp, Abra ni- tida, Thyasira spp., Ennucula (Nuculoma) tenuis, Heteromastes filiformis (probably misidentified with Mediomastes firagilis), Chaetozone setosa and Diplocirrus glau- cus. Compared to the present paper Myri- ochele sp„ Phoronis sp. and Ennucula (Nuculoma) tenuis are not among the five most frequent species. The Shannon in- dices for each separate sample were be- tween 1.67 and 3.81 with an average of 2.51 which is clearly lower than the aver- age of 3.5 in this paper. The Pielou even- ness index is also quite low (0.62) com- pared to 0.74 in this paper. A general comparison between the re- sults from Nørrevang (1990) and the pres- ent paper shows lower diversity indices and a higher dominance by a few species. Also the composition of species is a little different. A likely explanation for this dif- ference could be that the sample stations in Nørrevang (1990) were placed in the deep- est parts of the fjords where the organic content of the sediments are high and the oxygen conditions at least in late summer are unfavorable. Jørgensen (1993) sampled five locali- ties in Skálafjørður and analyzed for macrofauna and physical/chemical param- eters. From the data she concluded that the benthic fauna could be separated into three different community types. One shallow water community type on the sill at the fjord entrance, another community type in the deepest part of the ijord and a third community type at the innermost part of the ljord. A total of about 107 different species from 12 different phyla were iden- tified from all stations. Eleven different species were among the five most common species from each station (Table 7). Com- pared with the present paper there are a few species with a common high fre- quency, they are Heteromastes filiformis (probably identical with Mediomastus fra- gilis), Thyasira flexuosa/gouldii and Abra nitida. The average species number per 0.1 m2 was 34 (22-49) and this is a little higher compared to the present paper (Table 1) which was 29 (5-66). The average abun- dance per 0.1 m2 was 814 (361-2293) which is about three times higher com- pared to the present paper (Table 1). The average ratio between number of individu- als and the number of species per sample was 23.8 (9.5-46.8) which also is about three times the value found in this paper (Table 1). If we look at the distribution oí the species number in major taxonomic groups we get the usual picture with a heavy domination of polychaetes, fol- lowed by a distinctly lower number ol molluscs. This is comparable with our fin- dings. Sakarisson (2000) investigated two sta- tions from Skálafjord sampled in 1998 and one station from Kaldbakstjørður sampleđ in 1999. All samples were sampled with 0.1 m2 grab and stations SK05 and SK09
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212

x

Fróðskaparrit

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Fróðskaparrit
https://timarit.is/publication/15

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.