Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.2007, Side 187

Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.2007, Side 187
HVUSSU SEYÐABIT ÁVIRKAR FJALLAVØKSTUR OG ARBUSKUL SOPPRÓT 185 of Agrostis capillaris to decrease when the grazers were removed (Hartley and Mitchell, 2005; Huline et al., 1999). This decrease has been explained by a change in the plant coinposition to more grazing-in- tolerant plant species such as Deschampsia flexuosa and Molinia caerulea (Hulme et al., 1999). The palatable grass Agrostis capillaris did not have a signifícant response to graz- ing, but the response was very similar to the response of Agrostis canina, which had signifícant increase in abundance inside the enclosure, indicating that these palat- able grasses were affected by grazing. The response of grazing was more root growth and greater %RLC. Both these factors are known to increase nutrient uptake by the plant. While keeping sheep out of the plots, the enclosure also had one more unin- tended impact: it also eliminated one nutri- ent resource otherwise available for the plants, namely sheep urine and sheep dung. This could make species like Agrostis capillaris more vulnerable than other species, as A. capillaris has the high- est nutrient requirements in Table 1. A study using Agrostis capillaris to examine the impact of defoliation on the distribu- tion of nitrogen between shoot, roots, and soil nitrogen pool found that root biomass was decreased by regular defoliation and this coincided with greater amounts of ni- trogen stemming from sheep urine (in this case l5N-labelled synthetic sheep urine) (Williams et al., 2003). The good correlation between %FR and %RLC might suggest that greater colonisa- tion would be expected if increased fíne root production occuned. The observed differences in mycorrhizal colonisation in response to grazing may have been due to changes in the fraction of fine roots in re- sponse to grazing, rather than a direct re- sponse of the mycorrhizal fungi them- selves. Conclusions and future perspectives Three questions were posed. Firstly, how sheep grazing changes the vegetation com- position. In this study we have found that sheep grazing decreased the biomass of the vegetation in both lowland and alpine areas in tenns of lower vegetation cover and lower vegetation height. We also found that the abundance of palatable graminoids decreased in grazed plots. Secondly, whether grazing by sheep changes the arbuscular colonisation pat- tem. This can also be answered positively as we found a higher fraction of fme roots as well as greater colonisation in grazed plots, in particular at the alpine site. This study did not give a clear answer to the third question, whether grazing by sheep changes the interactions in arbuscu- lar mycorrhizal symbiosis in terms of com- bined plant and fungal responses. The grass species used may not be appropriate, as A. capillaris might be more dependent on nutrient availability than other grasses. Future studies should include nutrient availability as a factor, as well as include several plant species, which should be studied both in terms of specific biomass, grazing preferences as well as mycotrhizal colonisation.
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146
Side 147
Side 148
Side 149
Side 150
Side 151
Side 152
Side 153
Side 154
Side 155
Side 156
Side 157
Side 158
Side 159
Side 160
Side 161
Side 162
Side 163
Side 164
Side 165
Side 166
Side 167
Side 168
Side 169
Side 170
Side 171
Side 172
Side 173
Side 174
Side 175
Side 176
Side 177
Side 178
Side 179
Side 180
Side 181
Side 182
Side 183
Side 184
Side 185
Side 186
Side 187
Side 188
Side 189
Side 190
Side 191
Side 192
Side 193
Side 194
Side 195
Side 196
Side 197
Side 198
Side 199
Side 200
Side 201
Side 202
Side 203
Side 204
Side 205
Side 206
Side 207
Side 208
Side 209
Side 210
Side 211
Side 212

x

Fróðskaparrit

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Fróðskaparrit
https://timarit.is/publication/15

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.