Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.2007, Page 187

Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.2007, Page 187
HVUSSU SEYÐABIT ÁVIRKAR FJALLAVØKSTUR OG ARBUSKUL SOPPRÓT 185 of Agrostis capillaris to decrease when the grazers were removed (Hartley and Mitchell, 2005; Huline et al., 1999). This decrease has been explained by a change in the plant coinposition to more grazing-in- tolerant plant species such as Deschampsia flexuosa and Molinia caerulea (Hulme et al., 1999). The palatable grass Agrostis capillaris did not have a signifícant response to graz- ing, but the response was very similar to the response of Agrostis canina, which had signifícant increase in abundance inside the enclosure, indicating that these palat- able grasses were affected by grazing. The response of grazing was more root growth and greater %RLC. Both these factors are known to increase nutrient uptake by the plant. While keeping sheep out of the plots, the enclosure also had one more unin- tended impact: it also eliminated one nutri- ent resource otherwise available for the plants, namely sheep urine and sheep dung. This could make species like Agrostis capillaris more vulnerable than other species, as A. capillaris has the high- est nutrient requirements in Table 1. A study using Agrostis capillaris to examine the impact of defoliation on the distribu- tion of nitrogen between shoot, roots, and soil nitrogen pool found that root biomass was decreased by regular defoliation and this coincided with greater amounts of ni- trogen stemming from sheep urine (in this case l5N-labelled synthetic sheep urine) (Williams et al., 2003). The good correlation between %FR and %RLC might suggest that greater colonisa- tion would be expected if increased fíne root production occuned. The observed differences in mycorrhizal colonisation in response to grazing may have been due to changes in the fraction of fine roots in re- sponse to grazing, rather than a direct re- sponse of the mycorrhizal fungi them- selves. Conclusions and future perspectives Three questions were posed. Firstly, how sheep grazing changes the vegetation com- position. In this study we have found that sheep grazing decreased the biomass of the vegetation in both lowland and alpine areas in tenns of lower vegetation cover and lower vegetation height. We also found that the abundance of palatable graminoids decreased in grazed plots. Secondly, whether grazing by sheep changes the arbuscular colonisation pat- tem. This can also be answered positively as we found a higher fraction of fme roots as well as greater colonisation in grazed plots, in particular at the alpine site. This study did not give a clear answer to the third question, whether grazing by sheep changes the interactions in arbuscu- lar mycorrhizal symbiosis in terms of com- bined plant and fungal responses. The grass species used may not be appropriate, as A. capillaris might be more dependent on nutrient availability than other grasses. Future studies should include nutrient availability as a factor, as well as include several plant species, which should be studied both in terms of specific biomass, grazing preferences as well as mycotrhizal colonisation.
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212

x

Fróðskaparrit

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Fróðskaparrit
https://timarit.is/publication/15

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.