Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.1970, Síða 59

The oral-formulaic structure of the Faroese kvæði
67
present in large numbers are formulaic stanzas and runs of
stanzas.3 Some of what Boor referred to is merely the grand
kind of incremental repetition discussed above; the simpler
kind, characteristic of the Danish and English ballad, is present
too. But important and significant are the single stanzas that
appear again when the story calls for them; for example:
II. A. The death of Fáfnir and the death of Guðrun’s son:
1.108 Tað var Sjúrður Sigmundarson, sínum svørði brá,
hann kleyv henda frænarorm sundur í lutir tvá.
3.32 Tað var Hegnir Júkason, sínum svørði brá,
hann kleyv Guðrunar unga son sundur í lutir tvá.
B. Sjúrður and Hegnir (unga) are born and grow up:
1.28 & 30 Sveipar hon hann í klæði rein, tá hann kom í heim,
Sjúrða bað hon nevna tann gævilega svein....
Hann veks upp hjá síni móður, Gud gav honum vekst,
meiri veks hann í ein mánað enn onnur børn í seks.
3.101 & 108 Sveipar hon hann í klæði rein, tá hann kom í
heim,
Hegnir bað hon kalla tann gæviliga svein....
Hann veks upp í ríkinum, Gud gav honum vekst,
meira veks hann í ein mánað enn onnur børn í seks.
Certainly such stanzas fit at least Whitman’s definition of
the formula: semantic units identified with a metric demand.
For clearly the metric unit of ballad is the stanza — perhaps
this is where we should look to define its formulaic unit. Im-
portantly, also, the stanza is the significant structural differ-
ence between Old English poetry, Serbocroatian, and Homeric
narrative, on the one hand, and Faroese kvæði and Icelandic
5) Helmut de Boor, Die faroischen Lieder des Nibeltmgenzyklus (Heidel-
berg, 1918), pp. 8—9, cited but misinterpreted by F. P. Magoun, Jr,
»Bede’s story of Caedman«, Speculum 30.52 (1955).