Jökull


Jökull - 01.12.1988, Side 25

Jökull - 01.12.1988, Side 25
both pushing and squeezing mechanisms. A third process, which can be seen in operation along much of the present Svínafellsjökull ice-front, is that of ridge formation by "dumping" mechanisms (Goldthwait, 1951; Price, 1977; Boulton and Eyles, 1979). Englacial and supraglacial debris, released by ablation at the glacier snout may accumulate at the base of the ice front, forming a ridge once the ice has retreated. Whilst in contact with the ice, the form of such ridges may be extensively modified by saturated flow slides, triggered by the abundance of meltwater and the low permeability of the sedi- ments. The "dumping" process is clearly most effective when the debris content of the ice is high, and where rates of forward movement at the snout are balanced by the horizontal component of ablation, so that the ice-front remains in more or less the same position for several years. Both of these conditions are met at Svínafellsjökull, where the sediment content of ice in the terminal zone is enriched by the elevation of debris-laden basal layers along inclined shear planes, as a result of severe compression of the gla- cier snout against the barrier of steep end moraines. The moraines themselves have developed by posi- tive feedback from the superimposition and bulldoz- ing of successive ridges, but may originally have formed from a nucleus of outwash sediment, as in the model proposed by Boulton (1986) for Breiðamerkurjökull. Sections cut by meltwater channels through the highest moraines at Svínafells- jökull reveal a substantial proportion of well- rounded cobbles and boulders, comparable with those of the modem outwash fans. Supraglacial debris can also be deposited more extensively by the widespread downwasting of stag- nant ice within the terminal zone, to produce a dis- tinctive facies of "hummocky moraine". Such depo- sits are well developed in front of many of the steep Öræfajökull outlet glaciers (Eyles, 1978, 1979, 1983a), and are seen to a limited extent at Svína- fellsjökull, especially at the northem and southem margins of the glacier snout (Fig. 2), where elevated basal debris combines with laterally derived material to produce a continuous veneer of supraglacial sediment. Similar conditions exist on Skaftafellsjökull, where supraglacial debris is con- veyed along major lateral and medial moraines (Fig. 2). In this case however, the deposits are rarely preserved within the proglacial zone, as the debris becomes widely dispersed at the snout by splaying crevasses, and is largely removed by powerful melt- water streams emerging from beneath the glacier (Eyles, 1978). It can be seen therefore, that Skaftafellsjökull and Svínafellsjökull are characterized by two quite different assemblages of glacial landforms and depo- sits: The moraines of Skaftafellsjökull are dom- inated by subglacial lodgement till, moulded by minor oscillations of the retreating ice-front into a series of broad concentric ridges. At Svínafellsjökull by contrast, the altemate episodes of slow recession and readvance have produced a more complex series of higher push-moraines, composed largely of eng- lacial and supraglacial debris, together with reworked outwash material. HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT 1904 -1930 The earliest detailed topographic survey of the glaciers and their associated moraines was under- taken in 1904 by the Danish General Staff, at a scale of 1:50,000, and this provides a valuable point of reference which can be tied-in with more recent sur- veys and with the earlier Neoglacial moraines (Fig. 2). On this map a clear distinction is made between the older, stable moraines such as Stóralda, and a zone of younger moraines at the glacier margin. The latter are shown to be continuous with both medial and lateral features on the surface of the ice, and may therefore have been ice-cored at the time of the survey. If this suggestion is correct then the distal rather than proximal margin of these moraines as depicted on the 1904 map should mark the true posi- tion of the ice-front at this time. At Skaftafellsjökull, the position of this distal margin is found to correspond with that of the outer- most moraines (Fig. 2). Thompson andJones (1986) JÖKULL, No. 38, 1988 23
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116

x

Jökull

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.