Jökull


Jökull - 01.12.1988, Síða 25

Jökull - 01.12.1988, Síða 25
both pushing and squeezing mechanisms. A third process, which can be seen in operation along much of the present Svínafellsjökull ice-front, is that of ridge formation by "dumping" mechanisms (Goldthwait, 1951; Price, 1977; Boulton and Eyles, 1979). Englacial and supraglacial debris, released by ablation at the glacier snout may accumulate at the base of the ice front, forming a ridge once the ice has retreated. Whilst in contact with the ice, the form of such ridges may be extensively modified by saturated flow slides, triggered by the abundance of meltwater and the low permeability of the sedi- ments. The "dumping" process is clearly most effective when the debris content of the ice is high, and where rates of forward movement at the snout are balanced by the horizontal component of ablation, so that the ice-front remains in more or less the same position for several years. Both of these conditions are met at Svínafellsjökull, where the sediment content of ice in the terminal zone is enriched by the elevation of debris-laden basal layers along inclined shear planes, as a result of severe compression of the gla- cier snout against the barrier of steep end moraines. The moraines themselves have developed by posi- tive feedback from the superimposition and bulldoz- ing of successive ridges, but may originally have formed from a nucleus of outwash sediment, as in the model proposed by Boulton (1986) for Breiðamerkurjökull. Sections cut by meltwater channels through the highest moraines at Svínafells- jökull reveal a substantial proportion of well- rounded cobbles and boulders, comparable with those of the modem outwash fans. Supraglacial debris can also be deposited more extensively by the widespread downwasting of stag- nant ice within the terminal zone, to produce a dis- tinctive facies of "hummocky moraine". Such depo- sits are well developed in front of many of the steep Öræfajökull outlet glaciers (Eyles, 1978, 1979, 1983a), and are seen to a limited extent at Svína- fellsjökull, especially at the northem and southem margins of the glacier snout (Fig. 2), where elevated basal debris combines with laterally derived material to produce a continuous veneer of supraglacial sediment. Similar conditions exist on Skaftafellsjökull, where supraglacial debris is con- veyed along major lateral and medial moraines (Fig. 2). In this case however, the deposits are rarely preserved within the proglacial zone, as the debris becomes widely dispersed at the snout by splaying crevasses, and is largely removed by powerful melt- water streams emerging from beneath the glacier (Eyles, 1978). It can be seen therefore, that Skaftafellsjökull and Svínafellsjökull are characterized by two quite different assemblages of glacial landforms and depo- sits: The moraines of Skaftafellsjökull are dom- inated by subglacial lodgement till, moulded by minor oscillations of the retreating ice-front into a series of broad concentric ridges. At Svínafellsjökull by contrast, the altemate episodes of slow recession and readvance have produced a more complex series of higher push-moraines, composed largely of eng- lacial and supraglacial debris, together with reworked outwash material. HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT 1904 -1930 The earliest detailed topographic survey of the glaciers and their associated moraines was under- taken in 1904 by the Danish General Staff, at a scale of 1:50,000, and this provides a valuable point of reference which can be tied-in with more recent sur- veys and with the earlier Neoglacial moraines (Fig. 2). On this map a clear distinction is made between the older, stable moraines such as Stóralda, and a zone of younger moraines at the glacier margin. The latter are shown to be continuous with both medial and lateral features on the surface of the ice, and may therefore have been ice-cored at the time of the survey. If this suggestion is correct then the distal rather than proximal margin of these moraines as depicted on the 1904 map should mark the true posi- tion of the ice-front at this time. At Skaftafellsjökull, the position of this distal margin is found to correspond with that of the outer- most moraines (Fig. 2). Thompson andJones (1986) JÖKULL, No. 38, 1988 23
Síða 1
Síða 2
Síða 3
Síða 4
Síða 5
Síða 6
Síða 7
Síða 8
Síða 9
Síða 10
Síða 11
Síða 12
Síða 13
Síða 14
Síða 15
Síða 16
Síða 17
Síða 18
Síða 19
Síða 20
Síða 21
Síða 22
Síða 23
Síða 24
Síða 25
Síða 26
Síða 27
Síða 28
Síða 29
Síða 30
Síða 31
Síða 32
Síða 33
Síða 34
Síða 35
Síða 36
Síða 37
Síða 38
Síða 39
Síða 40
Síða 41
Síða 42
Síða 43
Síða 44
Síða 45
Síða 46
Síða 47
Síða 48
Síða 49
Síða 50
Síða 51
Síða 52
Síða 53
Síða 54
Síða 55
Síða 56
Síða 57
Síða 58
Síða 59
Síða 60
Síða 61
Síða 62
Síða 63
Síða 64
Síða 65
Síða 66
Síða 67
Síða 68
Síða 69
Síða 70
Síða 71
Síða 72
Síða 73
Síða 74
Síða 75
Síða 76
Síða 77
Síða 78
Síða 79
Síða 80
Síða 81
Síða 82
Síða 83
Síða 84
Síða 85
Síða 86
Síða 87
Síða 88
Síða 89
Síða 90
Síða 91
Síða 92
Síða 93
Síða 94
Síða 95
Síða 96
Síða 97
Síða 98
Síða 99
Síða 100
Síða 101
Síða 102
Síða 103
Síða 104
Síða 105
Síða 106
Síða 107
Síða 108
Síða 109
Síða 110
Síða 111
Síða 112
Síða 113
Síða 114
Síða 115
Síða 116

x

Jökull

Beinleiðis leinki

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.