Jökull


Jökull - 01.12.1988, Page 25

Jökull - 01.12.1988, Page 25
both pushing and squeezing mechanisms. A third process, which can be seen in operation along much of the present Svínafellsjökull ice-front, is that of ridge formation by "dumping" mechanisms (Goldthwait, 1951; Price, 1977; Boulton and Eyles, 1979). Englacial and supraglacial debris, released by ablation at the glacier snout may accumulate at the base of the ice front, forming a ridge once the ice has retreated. Whilst in contact with the ice, the form of such ridges may be extensively modified by saturated flow slides, triggered by the abundance of meltwater and the low permeability of the sedi- ments. The "dumping" process is clearly most effective when the debris content of the ice is high, and where rates of forward movement at the snout are balanced by the horizontal component of ablation, so that the ice-front remains in more or less the same position for several years. Both of these conditions are met at Svínafellsjökull, where the sediment content of ice in the terminal zone is enriched by the elevation of debris-laden basal layers along inclined shear planes, as a result of severe compression of the gla- cier snout against the barrier of steep end moraines. The moraines themselves have developed by posi- tive feedback from the superimposition and bulldoz- ing of successive ridges, but may originally have formed from a nucleus of outwash sediment, as in the model proposed by Boulton (1986) for Breiðamerkurjökull. Sections cut by meltwater channels through the highest moraines at Svínafells- jökull reveal a substantial proportion of well- rounded cobbles and boulders, comparable with those of the modem outwash fans. Supraglacial debris can also be deposited more extensively by the widespread downwasting of stag- nant ice within the terminal zone, to produce a dis- tinctive facies of "hummocky moraine". Such depo- sits are well developed in front of many of the steep Öræfajökull outlet glaciers (Eyles, 1978, 1979, 1983a), and are seen to a limited extent at Svína- fellsjökull, especially at the northem and southem margins of the glacier snout (Fig. 2), where elevated basal debris combines with laterally derived material to produce a continuous veneer of supraglacial sediment. Similar conditions exist on Skaftafellsjökull, where supraglacial debris is con- veyed along major lateral and medial moraines (Fig. 2). In this case however, the deposits are rarely preserved within the proglacial zone, as the debris becomes widely dispersed at the snout by splaying crevasses, and is largely removed by powerful melt- water streams emerging from beneath the glacier (Eyles, 1978). It can be seen therefore, that Skaftafellsjökull and Svínafellsjökull are characterized by two quite different assemblages of glacial landforms and depo- sits: The moraines of Skaftafellsjökull are dom- inated by subglacial lodgement till, moulded by minor oscillations of the retreating ice-front into a series of broad concentric ridges. At Svínafellsjökull by contrast, the altemate episodes of slow recession and readvance have produced a more complex series of higher push-moraines, composed largely of eng- lacial and supraglacial debris, together with reworked outwash material. HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT 1904 -1930 The earliest detailed topographic survey of the glaciers and their associated moraines was under- taken in 1904 by the Danish General Staff, at a scale of 1:50,000, and this provides a valuable point of reference which can be tied-in with more recent sur- veys and with the earlier Neoglacial moraines (Fig. 2). On this map a clear distinction is made between the older, stable moraines such as Stóralda, and a zone of younger moraines at the glacier margin. The latter are shown to be continuous with both medial and lateral features on the surface of the ice, and may therefore have been ice-cored at the time of the survey. If this suggestion is correct then the distal rather than proximal margin of these moraines as depicted on the 1904 map should mark the true posi- tion of the ice-front at this time. At Skaftafellsjökull, the position of this distal margin is found to correspond with that of the outer- most moraines (Fig. 2). Thompson andJones (1986) JÖKULL, No. 38, 1988 23
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116

x

Jökull

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.