Jökull


Jökull - 01.12.1988, Side 26

Jökull - 01.12.1988, Side 26
incorrectly assumed these moraines to be Little Ice Age features, dating from 1870 (as at Svínafells- jökull), despite the fact that corresponding lichen measurements were anomalously small, falling well below the general calibration curve. The present view, that the moraines are more recent features dat- ing from about 1904, is thought to be a more accu- rate interpretation, supported by both cartographic and lichenometric evidence (Table 1). At Svínafellsjökull, the 1904 position is found on the proximal side of the earlier Neoglacial limits, and in many places has been obscured by more recent readvances of the snout (Fig. 5). After 1904, no further documentary or carto- graphic evidence is available until 1932, when the Icelandic Meteorological Office began its annual measurements. It appears however that the interven- ing period was one of complex ice-marginal fluctua- tions: Thorarinsson (1943, p. 47) noted that the southem Vatnajökull glaciers were generally affected by three episodes of stagnation or read- vance during the early part of this century, follow- ing the strong recession of the 1890s. At Skaftafells- jökull, three distinct ridges are found on the proxi- mal side of the 1904 moraine (Fig. 5). Lichen meas- urements from these ridges yield dates of 1906, 1917 and 1930 respectively (Table 1), when com- pared with the calibration curve developed from other, independently dated moraines (Fig. 6 in Thompson and Jones, 1986). The younger of these moraines is roughly coincident with the "apparent" position of the ice front on the 1904 map, lending further support to the suggestion that this had merely been the contact between clean and debris- laden ice at the time of the survey, and did not become stable enough for permanent lichen coloni- zation for a further 26 years. At Svínafellsjökull, the height and complexity of the "1930" ridge would seem to suggest that here the three readvances retumed successively to the same position, building up a composite stmcture of super- imposed moraines. King and Ives’ (1955) suggestion that the height of these moraines may be indicative of an ice core now seems unlikely, as comparison of the 1945 and 1982 aerial photographs reveals no significant change in either morphology or elevation over this 37 year period. From a preliminary inspec- tion of lichen sizes along this moraine it appears to have been affected by more recent readvances of this part of the snout. Such advances may not have reached the crest of the moraines, but appear to have reactivated the proximal slopes by oversteepening (Fig. 4B). 1930 -1945 Both glaciers retreated very rapidly between 1930 and 1945, as indeed did most of the Icelandic gla- ciers, as a consequence of the marked amelioration of climate (see Fig. 3B and earlier discussion). Dur- ing this period the annual records for Skaftafells- jökull reveal two significant episodes of temporary readvance (1932-34) or stagnation (1938-39) at dis- tances of 1300 and 1000 metres (respectively) from the 1980 snout. Two very well-defined and clearly separated moraine ridges are found in corresponding locations in the field (Fig. 5), whilst a third ridge, which does not appear to be associated with any major fluctuation of the glacier, is found to correspond with the snout position on the aerial pho- tographs of 1945. An additional datum is provided by the short remnant of medial moraine between Skaftafellsjökull and the northem tip of Svínafells- jökull, where the glaciers are known to have separated in 1935 (Thorarinsson, 1956). At Svínafellsjökull, the 1945 ridge can again be identified from the aerial photographs, but between this and the 1930 crest there are numerous smaller and discontinuous ridges which cannot easily be assigned to specific fluctuations of the glacier. This uncertainty is heightened by the considerable relief of the morainic topography upon which the ridges are superimposed, and the consequent irregularity of both present and former outlines of the glacier snout. A well-marked trimline along the southem side of the valley, (noted by King and Ives, 1955), which appears to be associated with the high crest of the "1930" terminal and lateral moraines, serves to indi- cate the amount of recent downwasting of ice in this area, whilst a higher and more degraded trimline, 24 JÖKULL, No. 38, 1988
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116

x

Jökull

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.