Jökull


Jökull - 01.12.1988, Page 26

Jökull - 01.12.1988, Page 26
incorrectly assumed these moraines to be Little Ice Age features, dating from 1870 (as at Svínafells- jökull), despite the fact that corresponding lichen measurements were anomalously small, falling well below the general calibration curve. The present view, that the moraines are more recent features dat- ing from about 1904, is thought to be a more accu- rate interpretation, supported by both cartographic and lichenometric evidence (Table 1). At Svínafellsjökull, the 1904 position is found on the proximal side of the earlier Neoglacial limits, and in many places has been obscured by more recent readvances of the snout (Fig. 5). After 1904, no further documentary or carto- graphic evidence is available until 1932, when the Icelandic Meteorological Office began its annual measurements. It appears however that the interven- ing period was one of complex ice-marginal fluctua- tions: Thorarinsson (1943, p. 47) noted that the southem Vatnajökull glaciers were generally affected by three episodes of stagnation or read- vance during the early part of this century, follow- ing the strong recession of the 1890s. At Skaftafells- jökull, three distinct ridges are found on the proxi- mal side of the 1904 moraine (Fig. 5). Lichen meas- urements from these ridges yield dates of 1906, 1917 and 1930 respectively (Table 1), when com- pared with the calibration curve developed from other, independently dated moraines (Fig. 6 in Thompson and Jones, 1986). The younger of these moraines is roughly coincident with the "apparent" position of the ice front on the 1904 map, lending further support to the suggestion that this had merely been the contact between clean and debris- laden ice at the time of the survey, and did not become stable enough for permanent lichen coloni- zation for a further 26 years. At Svínafellsjökull, the height and complexity of the "1930" ridge would seem to suggest that here the three readvances retumed successively to the same position, building up a composite stmcture of super- imposed moraines. King and Ives’ (1955) suggestion that the height of these moraines may be indicative of an ice core now seems unlikely, as comparison of the 1945 and 1982 aerial photographs reveals no significant change in either morphology or elevation over this 37 year period. From a preliminary inspec- tion of lichen sizes along this moraine it appears to have been affected by more recent readvances of this part of the snout. Such advances may not have reached the crest of the moraines, but appear to have reactivated the proximal slopes by oversteepening (Fig. 4B). 1930 -1945 Both glaciers retreated very rapidly between 1930 and 1945, as indeed did most of the Icelandic gla- ciers, as a consequence of the marked amelioration of climate (see Fig. 3B and earlier discussion). Dur- ing this period the annual records for Skaftafells- jökull reveal two significant episodes of temporary readvance (1932-34) or stagnation (1938-39) at dis- tances of 1300 and 1000 metres (respectively) from the 1980 snout. Two very well-defined and clearly separated moraine ridges are found in corresponding locations in the field (Fig. 5), whilst a third ridge, which does not appear to be associated with any major fluctuation of the glacier, is found to correspond with the snout position on the aerial pho- tographs of 1945. An additional datum is provided by the short remnant of medial moraine between Skaftafellsjökull and the northem tip of Svínafells- jökull, where the glaciers are known to have separated in 1935 (Thorarinsson, 1956). At Svínafellsjökull, the 1945 ridge can again be identified from the aerial photographs, but between this and the 1930 crest there are numerous smaller and discontinuous ridges which cannot easily be assigned to specific fluctuations of the glacier. This uncertainty is heightened by the considerable relief of the morainic topography upon which the ridges are superimposed, and the consequent irregularity of both present and former outlines of the glacier snout. A well-marked trimline along the southem side of the valley, (noted by King and Ives, 1955), which appears to be associated with the high crest of the "1930" terminal and lateral moraines, serves to indi- cate the amount of recent downwasting of ice in this area, whilst a higher and more degraded trimline, 24 JÖKULL, No. 38, 1988
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116

x

Jökull

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.