Jökull


Jökull - 01.12.1988, Síða 26

Jökull - 01.12.1988, Síða 26
incorrectly assumed these moraines to be Little Ice Age features, dating from 1870 (as at Svínafells- jökull), despite the fact that corresponding lichen measurements were anomalously small, falling well below the general calibration curve. The present view, that the moraines are more recent features dat- ing from about 1904, is thought to be a more accu- rate interpretation, supported by both cartographic and lichenometric evidence (Table 1). At Svínafellsjökull, the 1904 position is found on the proximal side of the earlier Neoglacial limits, and in many places has been obscured by more recent readvances of the snout (Fig. 5). After 1904, no further documentary or carto- graphic evidence is available until 1932, when the Icelandic Meteorological Office began its annual measurements. It appears however that the interven- ing period was one of complex ice-marginal fluctua- tions: Thorarinsson (1943, p. 47) noted that the southem Vatnajökull glaciers were generally affected by three episodes of stagnation or read- vance during the early part of this century, follow- ing the strong recession of the 1890s. At Skaftafells- jökull, three distinct ridges are found on the proxi- mal side of the 1904 moraine (Fig. 5). Lichen meas- urements from these ridges yield dates of 1906, 1917 and 1930 respectively (Table 1), when com- pared with the calibration curve developed from other, independently dated moraines (Fig. 6 in Thompson and Jones, 1986). The younger of these moraines is roughly coincident with the "apparent" position of the ice front on the 1904 map, lending further support to the suggestion that this had merely been the contact between clean and debris- laden ice at the time of the survey, and did not become stable enough for permanent lichen coloni- zation for a further 26 years. At Svínafellsjökull, the height and complexity of the "1930" ridge would seem to suggest that here the three readvances retumed successively to the same position, building up a composite stmcture of super- imposed moraines. King and Ives’ (1955) suggestion that the height of these moraines may be indicative of an ice core now seems unlikely, as comparison of the 1945 and 1982 aerial photographs reveals no significant change in either morphology or elevation over this 37 year period. From a preliminary inspec- tion of lichen sizes along this moraine it appears to have been affected by more recent readvances of this part of the snout. Such advances may not have reached the crest of the moraines, but appear to have reactivated the proximal slopes by oversteepening (Fig. 4B). 1930 -1945 Both glaciers retreated very rapidly between 1930 and 1945, as indeed did most of the Icelandic gla- ciers, as a consequence of the marked amelioration of climate (see Fig. 3B and earlier discussion). Dur- ing this period the annual records for Skaftafells- jökull reveal two significant episodes of temporary readvance (1932-34) or stagnation (1938-39) at dis- tances of 1300 and 1000 metres (respectively) from the 1980 snout. Two very well-defined and clearly separated moraine ridges are found in corresponding locations in the field (Fig. 5), whilst a third ridge, which does not appear to be associated with any major fluctuation of the glacier, is found to correspond with the snout position on the aerial pho- tographs of 1945. An additional datum is provided by the short remnant of medial moraine between Skaftafellsjökull and the northem tip of Svínafells- jökull, where the glaciers are known to have separated in 1935 (Thorarinsson, 1956). At Svínafellsjökull, the 1945 ridge can again be identified from the aerial photographs, but between this and the 1930 crest there are numerous smaller and discontinuous ridges which cannot easily be assigned to specific fluctuations of the glacier. This uncertainty is heightened by the considerable relief of the morainic topography upon which the ridges are superimposed, and the consequent irregularity of both present and former outlines of the glacier snout. A well-marked trimline along the southem side of the valley, (noted by King and Ives, 1955), which appears to be associated with the high crest of the "1930" terminal and lateral moraines, serves to indi- cate the amount of recent downwasting of ice in this area, whilst a higher and more degraded trimline, 24 JÖKULL, No. 38, 1988
Síða 1
Síða 2
Síða 3
Síða 4
Síða 5
Síða 6
Síða 7
Síða 8
Síða 9
Síða 10
Síða 11
Síða 12
Síða 13
Síða 14
Síða 15
Síða 16
Síða 17
Síða 18
Síða 19
Síða 20
Síða 21
Síða 22
Síða 23
Síða 24
Síða 25
Síða 26
Síða 27
Síða 28
Síða 29
Síða 30
Síða 31
Síða 32
Síða 33
Síða 34
Síða 35
Síða 36
Síða 37
Síða 38
Síða 39
Síða 40
Síða 41
Síða 42
Síða 43
Síða 44
Síða 45
Síða 46
Síða 47
Síða 48
Síða 49
Síða 50
Síða 51
Síða 52
Síða 53
Síða 54
Síða 55
Síða 56
Síða 57
Síða 58
Síða 59
Síða 60
Síða 61
Síða 62
Síða 63
Síða 64
Síða 65
Síða 66
Síða 67
Síða 68
Síða 69
Síða 70
Síða 71
Síða 72
Síða 73
Síða 74
Síða 75
Síða 76
Síða 77
Síða 78
Síða 79
Síða 80
Síða 81
Síða 82
Síða 83
Síða 84
Síða 85
Síða 86
Síða 87
Síða 88
Síða 89
Síða 90
Síða 91
Síða 92
Síða 93
Síða 94
Síða 95
Síða 96
Síða 97
Síða 98
Síða 99
Síða 100
Síða 101
Síða 102
Síða 103
Síða 104
Síða 105
Síða 106
Síða 107
Síða 108
Síða 109
Síða 110
Síða 111
Síða 112
Síða 113
Síða 114
Síða 115
Síða 116

x

Jökull

Beinleiðis leinki

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.