Archaeologia Islandica - 01.01.2011, Qupperneq 86

Archaeologia Islandica - 01.01.2011, Qupperneq 86
DOUGLAS J. BOLENDER, JOHN M. STEINBERG AND BRIAN N. DAMIATA In theory, the difference between, farm abandonment and farmstead relocation is straightforward, but it can be quite complicated in practice. Abandoned farms often continued in social memory as distinct places only to be reoccupied at a later date and the short-term abandonment of farms, usually associated with the demographic impacts of famine or disease, was a common occurrence in the historical record (Vasey 1991). Also the abandonment of a fann property did not mean that the land was no longer in use. The land associated with many abandoned farms came under the control and productive use of other farms. For example, in Langholt the farm Meðalheimur appears to have originated as an early independent farm that was later incorporated into the property belonging to Glaumbær as a hjáleiga (dependent fann), and finally abandoned as a farm around 1700 only to be used into the 19th century as a sheep house (Sigurðardóttir 2011). In these cases farm abandonment often indicates not the abandonment of the land but the dissolution of the farming household while the land was incorporated into other properties where it - with its ruins, fields, and boundaries - could continue to shape pattems of land use and travel (Aldred and Lucas 2010). In the survey area we found evidence for two relatively straight-forward farmstead relocations: Stóra-Seyla and Glaumbær. At each site, there is temporal continuity between two discrete farmstead locations. Both moves appear to have occurred in the second half of the llth century and the new farmsteads were placed within 150 meters of the old sites, less than a third of the distance to their nearest contemporary neighbors (Torfgarður and Marbæli respectively). There is no reason to think that farmsteads could not have relocated over longer distances; however inferring such a move may be more ambiguous, especially when the original boundaries of the farm are uncertain and the two farmsteads could easily represent different farm properties. Ideally, archaeologists could point to similarities in the layout or practices between relocated farmsteads but this is practically difficult as most relocated farmsteads are at the bottom of farm-mounds. When compared to the overall settlement pattem in the survey area, these two farms exhibit certain similarities that provide some insights into farmstead relocation. The definitions for farmstead abandonment and relocation used here are derived from archaeological survey and are largely concerned with basic descriptions of the farm or farmstead as a whole and not the sequencing of individual elements of the farmstead. They largely ignore the complex issues of farmstead maintenance and reorganization apparent at many Viking Age sites. For example, excavations at Keldudalur in Hegranes show that the Viking Age fanuhouse was moved and later became the site of a Christian cemetery (Zoéga 2008). The reorganization of the site was all within the footprint of the contemporary farm-mound. Similarly, site relocation may have been a complex process taking place in increments as buildings and activities were moved piecemeal from the old location to the 84
Qupperneq 1
Qupperneq 2
Qupperneq 3
Qupperneq 4
Qupperneq 5
Qupperneq 6
Qupperneq 7
Qupperneq 8
Qupperneq 9
Qupperneq 10
Qupperneq 11
Qupperneq 12
Qupperneq 13
Qupperneq 14
Qupperneq 15
Qupperneq 16
Qupperneq 17
Qupperneq 18
Qupperneq 19
Qupperneq 20
Qupperneq 21
Qupperneq 22
Qupperneq 23
Qupperneq 24
Qupperneq 25
Qupperneq 26
Qupperneq 27
Qupperneq 28
Qupperneq 29
Qupperneq 30
Qupperneq 31
Qupperneq 32
Qupperneq 33
Qupperneq 34
Qupperneq 35
Qupperneq 36
Qupperneq 37
Qupperneq 38
Qupperneq 39
Qupperneq 40
Qupperneq 41
Qupperneq 42
Qupperneq 43
Qupperneq 44
Qupperneq 45
Qupperneq 46
Qupperneq 47
Qupperneq 48
Qupperneq 49
Qupperneq 50
Qupperneq 51
Qupperneq 52
Qupperneq 53
Qupperneq 54
Qupperneq 55
Qupperneq 56
Qupperneq 57
Qupperneq 58
Qupperneq 59
Qupperneq 60
Qupperneq 61
Qupperneq 62
Qupperneq 63
Qupperneq 64
Qupperneq 65
Qupperneq 66
Qupperneq 67
Qupperneq 68
Qupperneq 69
Qupperneq 70
Qupperneq 71
Qupperneq 72
Qupperneq 73
Qupperneq 74
Qupperneq 75
Qupperneq 76
Qupperneq 77
Qupperneq 78
Qupperneq 79
Qupperneq 80
Qupperneq 81
Qupperneq 82
Qupperneq 83
Qupperneq 84
Qupperneq 85
Qupperneq 86
Qupperneq 87
Qupperneq 88
Qupperneq 89
Qupperneq 90
Qupperneq 91
Qupperneq 92
Qupperneq 93
Qupperneq 94
Qupperneq 95
Qupperneq 96
Qupperneq 97
Qupperneq 98
Qupperneq 99
Qupperneq 100
Qupperneq 101
Qupperneq 102
Qupperneq 103
Qupperneq 104
Qupperneq 105
Qupperneq 106
Qupperneq 107
Qupperneq 108

x

Archaeologia Islandica

Direct Links

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Archaeologia Islandica
https://timarit.is/publication/1160

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.