Íslenskt mál og almenn málfræði - 01.01.2023, Side 219

Maling, Joan. 2002. Það rignir þágufalli á Íslandi: Verbs with dative objects in Icelandic.
Íslenskt mál og almenn málfræði 24:31–106.
Matsuo, Ayumi, Sotaro Kita, Yuri Shinya, Gary C. Wood and Letitia Naigles. 2012.
Japanese two-year-olds use morphosyntax to learn novel verb meanings. Journal of
Child Language 39(3):637–663. <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000911000213>.
McFadden, Thomas. 2020. Case in Germanic. Michael T. Putnam and B. Richard Page
(eds.): The Cambridge Handbook of Germanic Linguistics, pp. 282–312. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge. <https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108378291.014>.
Mohanan, K.P., and Tara Mohanan. 1990. Dative Subjects in Malayalam: Semantic
Information in Syntax. Manindra K. Verma and K.P. Mohanan (eds.): Experiencer
Subjects in South Asian Languages, pp. 43–57. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA.
Mohanan, Tara. 1994. Argument Structure in Hindi. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA.
Montaut, Annie. 2016. Noun-Verb Complex Predicates in Hindi and the rise of non-
canonical subjects. Léa Nash and Pollet Samvelian (eds.): Approaches to Complex
Predicates, pp. 142–174. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. <https://doi.org/10.1163/
9789004307094_007>.
Narasimhan, Bhuvana. 2005. Splitting the notion of ‘agent’: case-marking in early child
Hindi. Journal of Child Language 32(4):787–803. <https://doi.org/10.1017/S030
5000905007117>.
Nowenstein, Iris Edda. 2012. Mig langar sjálfri til þess: Rannsókn á innri breytileika í
fallmörkun frumlaga. BA-thesis, University of Iceland. <http://hdl.handle.net/1946/
12885>.
Nowenstein, Iris Edda. 2014. Intra-speaker Variation in Subject Case: Icelandic. University
of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 20(1):28. <https://repository.upenn.
edu/handle/20.500.14332/44978>.
Nowenstein, Iris Edda. 2017. Determining the nature of intra-speaker variation. Hösk -
uldur Thráinsson, Caroline Heycock, Zakarias Svabo and Hjalmar P. Petersen (eds.):
Syntactic Variation in Insular Scandinavian, pp. 92–112. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
<https://doi.org/10.1075/sigl.1.04now>.
Nowenstein, Iris Edda, and Anton Karl Ingason. 2021. Featural dynamics in morphosyn-
tactic change. Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson and Thórhallur Eythórsson (eds.): Syntactic
Features and the Limits of Syntactic Change, pp. 301–320. Oxford University Press,
Oxford. <https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198832584.003.0013>.
O’Donnell, Timothy J. 2015. Productivity and Reuse in Language: A Theory of Linguistic
Computation and Storage. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Pearl, Lisa, and Jon Sprouse. 2021. The acquisition of linking theories: A Tolerance and
Sufficiency Principle approach to deriving UTAH and rUTAH. Language Acquisition
28(3):294–325. <https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2021.1888295>.
Perkins, Laurel. 2019. How Grammars Grow: Argument Structure and the Acquisition of
Non-Basic Syntax. Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland.
Pinker, Steven. 1989. Learnability and cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure. The
MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Pinker, Steven. 1999. Words and Rules: The Ingredients of Language. Basic Books, New
York.
Ramchand, Gillian. 2008. Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First Phase Syntax. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge. <https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486319>.
References 219