Læknablaðið

Árgangur

Læknablaðið - 15.06.2009, Blaðsíða 18

Læknablaðið - 15.06.2009, Blaðsíða 18
F R Æ Ð I G R E I RANNSÓKN N A R 12. Semmens JB, Platell C, Threlfall TJ, Holman CD. A population-based study of the incidence, mortality and outcomes in patients following surgery for colorectal cancer in Western Australia. Aust N Z J Surg 2000; 70:11-8. 13. Faivre-Finn C, Bouvier-Benhamiche AM, Phelip JM, Manfredi S, Dancourt V, Faivre J. Colon cancer in France: evidence for improvement in management and survival. Gut 2002; 51:60-4. 14. Keating J, Pater P, Lolohea S, Wickremesekera K. The epidemiology of colorectal cancer: what can we learn from the New Zealand Cancer Registry? N Z Med J 2003; 116: U437. 15. The Cancer Registry of Norway. Cancer in Norway 2000. Norway 2003. 16. Gatta G, Ciccolallo L, Capocaccia R, et al. Differences in colorectal cancer survival between European and US populations: the importance of sub-site and morphology. Eur J Cancer 2003; 39: 2214-22. 17. Hagstofa íslands. Hagstofa íslands - Hagtölur. 2007; www. hagstofa.is / júní 2007. 18. Malila N, Hakulinen T. Epidemiological trends of colorectal cancer in the Nordic countries. Scand J Surg 2003; 92: 5-9. 19. Davidson NO. Genetic testing in colorectal cancer: who, when, how and why. Keio J Med 2007; 56:14-20. 20. Ferlay J, Engholm G, Storm HH, Ferlay J, Christensen N. Association of the Nordic Cancer Registries. 2008; www. ancr.nu/nordcan.asp /september 2008. 21. Heys SD, O'Hanrahan TJ, Brittenden J, Eremin O. Colorectal cancer in young patients: a review of the literature. Eur J Surg Oncol 1994; 20: 225-31. 22. Eker R. Some Prognostic Factors for Carcinomas of the Colon and Rectum. Acta Chir Scand 1963; 126: 636-56. 23. Jessup JM, McGinnis LS, Steele GD Jr, Menck HR, Winchester DP. The National Cancer Data Base. Report on colon cancer. Cancer 1996; 78: 918-26. 24. Mostafa G, Matthews BD, Norton HJ, Kercher KW, Sing RF, Heniford BT. Influence of demographics on colorectal cancer. Am Surg 2004; 70: 259-64. 25. Newland RC, Dent OF, Lyttle MN, Chapuis PH, Bokey EL. Pathologic determinants of survival associated with colorectal cancer with lymph node metastases. A multivariate analysis of 579 patients. Cancer 1994; 73: 2076-82. 26. Sasaki O, Atkin WS, Jass JR. Mucinous carcinoma of the rectum. Histopathology 1987; 11: 259-72. 27. Jass JR. Lymphocytic infiltration and survival in rectal cancer. J Clin Pathol 1986; 39: 585-9. 28. Angell-Andersen E, Tretli S, Coleman MP, Langmark F, Grotmol T. Colorectal cancer survival trends in Norway 1958-1997. Eur J Cancer 2004; 40: 734-42. 29. Scheiden R, Pescatore P, Wagener Y, Kieffer N, Capesius C. Colon cancer in Luxembourg: a national population-based data report, 1988-1998. BMC Cancer 2005; 5: 52-63. 30. Kotake K, Honjo S, Sugihara K, et al. Changes in colorectal cancer during a 20-year period: an extended report from the multi-institutional registry of large bowel cancer, Japan. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46 (10 Suppl): S32-43. 31. Han-Shiang C. Curative resection of colorectal adenocarcinoma: multivariate analysis of 5-year follow-up. World J Surg 1999; 23:1301-6. 32. Steinberg SM, Barwick KW, Stablein DM. Importance of tumor pathology and morphology in patients with surgically resected colon cancer. Findings from the Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group. Cancer 1986; 15; 58:1340-5. 33. Ropponen K, Eskelinen M, Kosma VM, Lipponen P, Paakkinen P, Alhava E. Comparison of classic and quantitative prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res 1996; 16(6B): 3875-82. 34. Takeuchi K, Kuwano H, Tsuzuki Y, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum. Hepatogastroenterology 2004; 51: 1698-702. 35. Gerhardsson M, Steineck G, Norell SE. Colorectal cancer in Sweden. A descriptive epidemiologic study. Acta Oncol 1990; 29: 855-61. 36. Helgason A, Yngvadóttir B, Hrafnkelsson B, Gulcher J, Stefánsson K. An Icelandic example of the impact of population structure on association studies. Nat Genet 2005; 37: 90-5. 37. Nelson RL, Dollear T, Freels S, Persky V. The relation of age, race, and gender to the subsite location of colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 1997; 80:193-7. >■ CC < s 5 3 </> 1 CO _J o 2 UJ Colon cancer in lceland 1955-2004. Study on epidemiology, histopathology and gender difference Objective: Colon cancer is the third most common cancer in lceland. The aim of this study was to analyze the epidemiology and histopathology of colon cancer in lceland, resection rate and the difference between men and women. Material and methods: Pathology and autopsy reports for all patients diagnosed with colon cancer between 1955 and 2004 where reviewed. All the histopathology material was re-evaluated. Demographical information and pathological findings were registered. Age-standardized incidence was calculated for both men and women. Gender difference was evaluated. Time trend was evaluated by linear regression. Results: After re-evaluation 2293 cases remained (1148 males and 1145 females). The incidence increased for men from 7.5, to 22.2/105 and for women from 8.6 to 15.1/105. Most tumors were located in the sigmoid colon (35%). Surgical rate increased from 50% to 85%. Adenocarcinomas where 84% and mucinous adenocarcinoma 7%. Altogether 7% of cases were TNM- stage I, 32% were stage II, 24% stage III, 21% in stage IV and stage was unknown in 16% of cases. Slight gender difference was observed regarding grade, vessel invasion, depth of invasion and anatomic subsite. Conclusion: Incidence of colon cancer increased considerably, mainly for men. Surgical rate and pathology of colon cancer is similar to that reported elsewhere except that there are somewhat fewer cases in TNM-stage I. Little gender difference was observed in the pathological parameters analysed. Snaebjornsson P, Jonasson L, Jonsson Th, Moller PH, Theodors A, Jonasson JG. Colon cancer in lceland 1955-2004. Study on epidemiology, histopathology and gender difference. Icel Med J 2009; 95; 423-30 Key words: colon cancer, histopathology, epidemiology, gender, population-based. Correspondence: Jón Gunntaugur Jónasson, jongj@landspitali.is Barst: 3. febrúar 2009, - samþykkt til birtingar: 29. apríl 2009 430 LÆKNAblaðið 2009/95
Blaðsíða 1
Blaðsíða 2
Blaðsíða 3
Blaðsíða 4
Blaðsíða 5
Blaðsíða 6
Blaðsíða 7
Blaðsíða 8
Blaðsíða 9
Blaðsíða 10
Blaðsíða 11
Blaðsíða 12
Blaðsíða 13
Blaðsíða 14
Blaðsíða 15
Blaðsíða 16
Blaðsíða 17
Blaðsíða 18
Blaðsíða 19
Blaðsíða 20
Blaðsíða 21
Blaðsíða 22
Blaðsíða 23
Blaðsíða 24
Blaðsíða 25
Blaðsíða 26
Blaðsíða 27
Blaðsíða 28
Blaðsíða 29
Blaðsíða 30
Blaðsíða 31
Blaðsíða 32
Blaðsíða 33
Blaðsíða 34
Blaðsíða 35
Blaðsíða 36
Blaðsíða 37
Blaðsíða 38
Blaðsíða 39
Blaðsíða 40
Blaðsíða 41
Blaðsíða 42
Blaðsíða 43
Blaðsíða 44
Blaðsíða 45
Blaðsíða 46
Blaðsíða 47
Blaðsíða 48
Blaðsíða 49
Blaðsíða 50
Blaðsíða 51
Blaðsíða 52
Blaðsíða 53
Blaðsíða 54
Blaðsíða 55
Blaðsíða 56
Blaðsíða 57
Blaðsíða 58
Blaðsíða 59
Blaðsíða 60
Blaðsíða 61
Blaðsíða 62
Blaðsíða 63
Blaðsíða 64
Blaðsíða 65
Blaðsíða 66
Blaðsíða 67
Blaðsíða 68

x

Læknablaðið

Beinir tenglar

Ef þú vilt tengja á þennan titil, vinsamlegast notaðu þessa tengla:

Tengja á þennan titil: Læknablaðið
https://timarit.is/publication/986

Tengja á þetta tölublað:

Tengja á þessa síðu:

Tengja á þessa grein:

Vinsamlegast ekki tengja beint á myndir eða PDF skjöl á Tímarit.is þar sem slíkar slóðir geta breyst án fyrirvara. Notið slóðirnar hér fyrir ofan til að tengja á vefinn.