Jökull


Jökull - 01.12.1991, Page 57

Jökull - 01.12.1991, Page 57
may be at the bottom of the normal zone in the Mosfellssveit area, but this direction does not fit the pole path found by Sigurgeirsson (1957 ; Kristjáns- son and Sigurgeirsson 1992) for the R3-N3 transition in lavas in Hvalfjörður. It is therefore possible e.g. that UK 7 belongs to a geomagnetic excursion within N3. The lowermost zone of normal-polarity lavas is followed by the relatively thick reverse lava series in the remainder of GB and UE as well as in UF. Continuous outcrops in this series end at the foot of Úlfarsfell due to scree, but we consider that profile UH covers the stratigraphic gap below the cliff pro- file UO in Úlfarsfell. Most of the upper part (UB) of Úlfarsfell is of nor- mal magnetization, which may correspond to the Olduvai subchron or possibly the elusive Gilsá sub- chron of approx. 1.6 M.y. age. We correlate this zone with the youngest normal zone in Esja, occurring in intrusions and hyaloclastites in the Svínaskarð (Móskarðshnúkar) profile SC of Kristjánsson et al. (1980) and in other late products of the Stardalur cen- tral volcano (Friðleifsson 1973, 1985). The very top of Úlfarsfell (Stórihnúkur peak), as well as profile UD, is reversely magnetized. The pat- tem of easterly declinations of remanence in UC 2 - 8 is remarkably similar to that in UD 1 - 5 (or 7) , and the inference that they are contemporaneous agrees well with the geological strike. In a more detailed survey of the Úlfarsfell area, it may become possible to correlate other small groups of lavas, or even individual lava units, over some distance with the aid of their paleomagnetic directions and other characteristics, for example between the profiles UL and UA/UB. Secular variation. Despite generally close within-unit directional agreement (95% confidence angles < 10° in Table 1), the lavas described here are much less satisfactory material for paleomagnetic secular varia- tion studies than are other lava sequences described so far from Iceland. The reasons for this are mostly geological: a) Tectonic tilt is quite large, with a correspond- ingly large uncertainty. b) Outcrops are not very good, possibly causing repeated sampling of the same flow in some instances, such as in the flat-lying Gufunes profile GB. c) Undetected faults, and lack of traceable hori- zons (such as extensive tuffs or petrographically dis- tinct lavas) may have caused duplicate sampling of a few lavas in adjacent profiles or even within the same profile: thus, the similar remanence directions in lavas GB 8, 12/13, 21 and 32/33 indicate that there are repeated segments (see Fig. 3). Similarly, the sites UB 13,14,15 and UB 15A,16,17 may actually repre- sent the same three (or two) flows. d) Relatively close grouping of directions in two to several successive lavas is common; it does not appear to be due to secondary regional remagnetiza- tion. Examples include UC 2-8 as pointed out above, UF 13-16, UD 10-20 and even UH 3-14. This serial correlation indicates that each such group of lavas was erupted in a short episode compared to secular variation time scales. For these reasons, we feel it is not appropriate at this stage to state any mean paleomagnetic directions or between-lava angular statistics for our collection. CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION We have mapped a composite 800 m thick section along a stretch of approximately 8 km from Gufunes to Hafrahlíð in the Mosfellssveit area. The section is mostly of reverse magnetization and most probably of Lower Matuyama age, somewhere in the range 1.6 to 2.2 million years. A normally magnetized zone of a few tens of m thickness overlies hyaloclastite at the base of the profile, and another normally magnetized zone of over 100 m thickness is found in the upper part of Úlfarsfell. We correlate (Fig. 5) the lower nor- mal zone with Einarsson's N3 zone in Kistufell and other locations farther east, and the upper zone with the final phase of the Stardalur volcano. These may correspond in time respectively to the Reunion and Olduvai subchrons, but additional radiometric dates in the area are needed to test this suggestion. The publication of the present pilot study is intended to stimulate further interest in the mapping of stratigraphy and structure in the Kjós-Mosfells- sveit-Reykjavík region. This mapping can be done JÖKULL, No. 41, 1991 55
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116

x

Jökull

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.