Archaeologia Islandica - 01.01.2011, Side 56

Archaeologia Islandica - 01.01.2011, Side 56
ADOLF FRIÐRiKSSON AND ORRI VÉSTEINSSON Figure 1. The distribution of pagan burials according to the value categories of the farms they are associated witli. clear that this does not reflect the original associations: cemeteries are often close to settlements long abandoned and for which no valuation figures are available and in many cases it is difficult to judge to which of two farms a cemeteiy belongs when it is situated on the boundary between them. It is important to note ín this context that a farm here denotes a lögbýli, a property which as a mle has one or two main households on the same site but can also have other subsidiary ones, sometimes in different locations. We approached this by looking first at the valuations of all the farms named in the catalogue (N=142 as 28 sites on common land or other unassessed land cannot be used) and then a subset of only those sites where little reasonable doubt couldbe raised aboutthe association (N=82). Figure 1 shows that there is no significant differenoe in the distribution of these two groups — a tendency in the literaturc to associate pagan cemetedes with tnajor farms showing up in the larger, less reliable, group. What is more Figure 1 shows that there is no significant difference in the distribution of pagan cemeteries according to the value category of the fann they are associated with and the distribution of all farms into these same categories. In other words pagan cemeteries are found in the same proportion of poor farms (1-12, 13-24 hundreds) as in middle sized (25-36, 37-48 hundreds) or large ones (+49 hundreds) suggesting that their distribution reflects that of farms in general. This suggests that pagan cemeteries are to be expected at all farms, irrespective of their size or value. The Christian paradigm of burial location In contrast to the pagan paradigm of burial location Christian cemeteries were as a mle located inside the home-field boundary. This has been observed also in Norse Greenland (Krogh 1976) and in 19th century Iceland it can be added that the cemeteries, invariably with a church, were not only in the home-field but also 54
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108

x

Archaeologia Islandica

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Archaeologia Islandica
https://timarit.is/publication/1160

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.