Læknablaðið - 15.09.2008, Blaðsíða 25

FRÆÐIGREINAR
RANNSÓKNIR
Kingdom: time trends in the general practice research
database. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106:151-5.
9. Smith GC, Pell JP, Dobbie R. Caesarean section and risk of
unexplained stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy. Lancet 2003;
362:1779-84.
10. Bahtiyar MO, Julien S, Robinson JN, et al. Prior cesarean
delivery is not associated with an increased risk of stillbirth
in a subsequent pregnancy: analysis of U.S. perinatal
mortality data, 1995-1997. Am J Obstet & Gynecol 2006; 195:
1373-8.
11. Geirsson RT. Er ávinningur af fleiri keisaraskurðaðgerðum?
Læknablaðið 2006; 92:185-7.
12. Landspítali háskólasjúkrahús. Gjaldskrá Landspítala
háskólasjúkrahúss fyrir sjúkratryggða 2007. Uppfærð í maí
2007. Available from: http://www4.landspitali.is/lsh_ytri.
nsf/pages/lsh_drg.html
13. McMahon MJ, Luther ER, Bowes WA, Olshan AF. Comparison
of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N
Engl J Med 1996; 335: 689-95.
14. The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.
Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2005; 89: 319-31.
15. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Birth
after previous caesarean birth. Green-top Guideline No. 45.
Febrúar 2007. Available from: www.rcog.org.uk/resources/
Public/pdf/green_top45_birthafter.pdf
16. Tumer MJ. Uterine mpture. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet
Gynaecol 2002; 16: 69-79.
17. Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, et al. Matemal and
perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior
cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2581-9.
18. Skýrsla frá fæðingaskráningunni fyrir árið 2006. Ritstj.:
Bjamadóttir RI, Garðarsdóttir G, Pálsson G, Smárason AK.
Kvennasvið og bamasvið, Landspítali 2007.
19. Kwee A, Bots ML, Visser GH, Bminse HW. Obstetric
management and outcome of pregnancy in women with a
history of caesarean section in the Netherlands. Eur J Obstet
Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007; 132:171-6.
20. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker
F, Kirmeyer S. Births: final data for 2004. National Vital
Statistics Reports 2006; 55:1-101.
21. Thomas J, Paranjothy S. National Sentinel Caesarean Section
Audit Report. RCOG Press: Royal College of Obstetricians
and Gynaecologists, Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit;
2001.
22. Flamm BL. Vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC). Best Pract
Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2001; 15: 81-92.
23. Phelan JP, Ahn MO, Diaz F, Brar HS, Rodriguez MH. Twice a
cesarean, always a cesarean? Obstet Gynecol 1989; 73:161-5.
24. Treffers PE, Pel M. The rising trend for caesarean birth. BMJ
1993; 307:1017-8.
25. Penn Z, Ghaem-Maghami S. Indications for caesarean
section. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2001; 15:1-15.
26. Coassolo KM, Stamilio DM, Pare E, et al. Safety and efficacy
of vaginal birth after cesarean attempts at or beyond 40
weeks of gestation. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106: 700-6.
27. Dodd J, Crowther C. Vaginal birth after Caesarean versus
elective repeat Caesarean for women with a single prior
Caesarean birth: a systematic review of the literature. Aust N
Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 44: 387-91.
28. Toppenberg KS, Block WA, Jr. Uterine rupture: what family
physicians need to know. Am Fam Physician 2002; 66: 823-8.
29. Socol ML. VBAC—is it worth the risk? Semin Perinatol 2003;
27:105-11.
30. Flamm BL. Once a cesarean, always a controversy. Obstet
Gynecol 1997; 90: 312-5.
31. Gochnour G, Ratcliffe S, Stone MB. The UTAH VBAC Study.
Matern Child Health J 2005; 9:181-8.
32. Yeh J, Wactawski-Wende J, Shelton JA, Reschke J. Temporal
trends in the rates of trial of labor in low-risk pregnancies and
their impact on the rates and success of vaginal birth after
cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194:144.
33. Macones GA, Peipert J, Nelson DB, et al. Matemal
complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a
multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193:1656-62.
34. Sachs BP, Kobelin C, Castro MA, Frigoletto F. The risks of
lowering the cesarean-delivery rate. N Engl J Med 1999; 340:
54-7.
35. Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP. Risk
of uterine mpture during labor among women with a prior
cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 3-8.
36. Macones GA, Cahill AG, Stamilio DM, Odibo A, Peipert
J, Stevens EJ. Can uterine rupture in patients attempting
vaginal birth after cesarean delivery be predicted? Am J
Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195:1148-52.
37. Skýrsla frá fæðingaskráningunni fyrir árið 2005. Ritstj:
Bjamadóttir RI, Garðarsdóttir G, Pálsson G, Smárason AK.
Kvennasvið og bamasvið, Landspítali 2006.
38. Guise JM, Hashima J, Osterweil P. Evidence-based vaginal
birth after Caesarean section. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet
Gynaecol 2005; 19:117-30.
39. Rozenberg P. Comment informer sur la voie d'accouchement
une patiente ayant un antecedent de cesarienne? Gynecol
Obstet Fertil 2005; 33:1003-8.
40. Smith GC, Pell JP, Cameron AD, Dobbie R. Risk of perinatal
death associated with labor after previous cesarean delivery
in uncomplicated term pregnancies. JAMA 2002; 287: 2684-
90.
41. Evidence Report / Technology Assessment: Number 71.
Vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC). Rockville, MD: Agency
for Healthcare Quality and Research; 2003.
42. Hashima JN, Eden KB, Osterweil P, Nygren P, Guise JM.
Predicting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a review of
prognostic factors and screening tools. Am J Obstet Gynecol
2004; 190: 547-55.
43. Grobman W. The MFMU cesarean registry: Development of
a clinically-useful prediction model for VBAC success. Am J
Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: S125.
44. Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong CY, et al. The MFMU
Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of
labor after previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol
2005; 193:1016-23.
45. Depp R. Cesarean Delivery. In: Gabbe SG, editor. Obstetrics.
Normal and Problem Pregnancies. Fourth ed: Churchill
Livingstone, 2002: 539-606.V
Barst: 4.2.08 - samþykkt til birtingar: 20.6.08
LÆKNAblaðið 2008/94 597