Skógræktarritið - 15.05.2001, Side 111

Skógræktarritið - 15.05.2001, Side 111
standing of the role of geographi- cal adaptation in different geno- types of the same tree species. ln Scotland, work on Pinus sylvestris (Scots pine) has shown clear dif- ferences between west and east coast genotypes (Kinloch et al, 1986). No work of this nature has been undertaken on tall moun- tain shrubs, in Scotland, with the consequence that there is no clear information on the best ways to restore genetically isolat- ed but ecologically extinct com- munities. Financial assistance available to Iand managers in Scotland comes in three distinct forms. Agricultural subsidy for farming and crofting in the uplands has always been a form of social sub- sidy, but it has been focussed on increasing agricultural produc- tion efficiency. By contrast, the forestry subsidy is a contribution to costs, historically as an incen- tive for the development a timber resource. This emphasis has changed recently to include the protection and expansion of semi-natural woodlands for bio- diversity reasons. SNH disburse grants for activities that benefit the natural heritage of Scotland. However, their grants are small and increasingly tied to habitats of international importance and sites designated through Natura 2000. They are also partitioned from forestry grants to avoid double funding. The down turn in agriculture and the increasing realisation that the main asset of the north of Scotland is its natural heritage have highlighted the inadequa- cies of current financial incen- tives for encouraging holistic management proposals from land managers. Conclusions and next steps Greater understanding of the benefits provided by a natural treeline and scrub zone are required before cogent argu- ments can be made in favour of grants for integrating this habitat with modified current uses. The necessary pressure required to deliver this will come from increased public awareness and, hence support. Effort to address this issue has been made through the promotional booklet called 'Montane Scrub’ (Scott, 2000) and the report by MacKenzie (2000) goes a long way to clarify the state of knowl- edge and understanding of scrub. In spring 2001, a conference plans to bring to a broad audi- ence a number of guidance notes summarising current best prac- tise in management and restora- tion of scrub for debate and development of consensus on the way ahead. The restoration of montane scrub is the logical next step fol- lowing restoration of woodland within the forest zone. However, there is a need for better infor- mation about the existing com- munities in order to halt their demise and prioritise action for restoration. As emphasis moves away from large numbers of her- bivores, both sheep and deer, there is scope to develop mon- tane scrub to provide shelter and additional food, as well as for biodiversity benefit. Recent infor- mation predicting woodland cover potential shows that on suitable ground in the Cairngorms high altitude scrub cover could be as much as forty- eight percent compared to the current cover of just under nine percent. An initial target to dou- ble this current area in order to stabilise the existing communi- ties is wholly reasonable. In parallel with moves to secure the existing communities there is a need to substantially improve our understanding of tall shrub plants and their toler- ance to browsing. Willows are adapted to browsing, but what is the relationship between the size of plants and colonies and graz- ing pressure? Another equally important area of research is the relative importance of seed pro- duction and asexual propaga- tion, and best practise in achiev- ing both. The answers to these questions need to be related to use of hill land by other interests to determine how scrub recovery can be integrated. But it is important that every current opportunity is taken to promote and undertake restoration, with- out waiting for the outcome of research. To allow this action we urgently need to find ways to make shrub plants visible within the current site survey methods that use NVC, and to properly reward management for biodiver- sity. Cross-sectoral compliance would need to be a key feature of such incentive schemes, with stewardship seen as the manage- ment focus. To facilitate such management initial best practise guidance has been produced through consultation with a wide range of upland land use inter- ests. Postscript Highland Birchwoods is a charitable company iimited by guarantee con- cerned with the role of forestry, and particularly native woodland, in rural development. Our underlying principle is that local access to local resources can provide the basis of a diverse rural economy contributing to long term sus- tainable employment and forest habi- tats. Consequently our work focuses on the research, development and promo- tion of good practise in management and use of forest areas at a local level. SKÓGRÆKTARRITIÐ 2001 l.tbl 109
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146
Side 147
Side 148
Side 149
Side 150
Side 151
Side 152
Side 153
Side 154
Side 155
Side 156
Side 157
Side 158
Side 159
Side 160
Side 161
Side 162
Side 163
Side 164
Side 165
Side 166
Side 167
Side 168
Side 169
Side 170
Side 171
Side 172
Side 173
Side 174
Side 175
Side 176
Side 177
Side 178
Side 179
Side 180
Side 181
Side 182
Side 183
Side 184
Side 185
Side 186
Side 187
Side 188
Side 189
Side 190
Side 191
Side 192
Side 193
Side 194
Side 195
Side 196
Side 197
Side 198
Side 199
Side 200
Side 201
Side 202
Side 203
Side 204
Side 205
Side 206
Side 207
Side 208
Side 209
Side 210
Side 211
Side 212

x

Skógræktarritið

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Skógræktarritið
https://timarit.is/publication/1996

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.