Skógræktarritið - 15.05.2001, Side 105

Skógræktarritið - 15.05.2001, Side 105
ment decision-making. But there are still two main limitations to most current DSTs: (1) firstly, most are not yet spatially explicit. i.e. they do not incorporate infor- mation at the landscape scale on the impacts of vegetation pattern and topography on ranging behaviour, partly because of a lack of data and partly because the software and computing power have only recently become sufficiently sophisticated; (2) sec- ondly, most of the available graz- ing models in the UK and else- where deal either only with open- ground vegetation or only with forest, because as yet we still have a poor understanding of for- est use when it represents only a small component of a whole complex of vegetation types. For this reason, a scoping studyis currently being undertaken to see where the main data shortages are, before we embark on new DST development for complex landscapes containing patches of forest within a ránge of other veg- etation types. This would aid managers of areas where trees form only a minor part of the landscape but where tree regen- eration is a major aim. Conclusion Grazing management for forest regeneration is a fundamentally important, yet highly complex, issue in countries such as Scotland, where natural forests have declined to such small remaining areas. Development of appropriate and sustainable management recommendations requires an integrated approach to a subject which encompasses many fields of expertise, from plant and animal physiology and ecology, through landscape sci- ence, to economics. it is only by integrating such approaches that we will be able to move towards the provision of sound prescrip- tions for a range of herbivore/for- est regeneration options within a changing economic and political climate. Acknowledgements I am grateful to Throstur Eysteinsson for inviting me to References Beaumont, D., Dugan, D., Evans, G., and Taylor, S. (1994) Deermanage- ment and tree regeneration in the RSPB reserve at Abernethy Forest. In: Aldhous, J.R. (Ed.), Our Pinewood Heritage. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh, pp. 186-195. Daneli, K., Niemela, P., Varvikko, T., and Vuorisala, T. (1991) Moose browsing on Scots pine along a gradient of plant productivity. Ecology, 72, 1624-1633. Danell, K„ Bergström, R„ and Edenius, L. (1994) Effects of large mammalian browsers on architecture, biomass, and nutrients of woody plants. J. Mammal., 75, 833-844. Edenius, L„ Danell, K. and Nyquist, H. (1995) Effects of simulated moose browsing on growth, mortal- ity, and fecundity in Scots pine. Can. J. For. Rcs„ 25, 529-535. Gilbert, D. this volume Gilbert, D„ Horsefield, D S-Thomp- son, D.B.A. (1997) The Ecology and Restoration of Montane and Sub- alpine Scrub Habitats in Scotland. Scottish Natural Heritage Review, 83, Scottish Natural Héritage, Battleby. Grace, J. & Easterbee, N. (1979) The natural shelter for red deer (Cervus elaphus) in a Scottish glen. Journal of Applied Ecology, 16, 37-48. Hester, A.|. (1995) Scrub in the Scottish Uplands. Scottisíi Natural Heritage RfWeu' No 24. Scottish Natural heritage, Battleby. Hester, A.|. & Miller, G.R. (1995) Scrub and woodland regeneration: prospects for the future. In Thompson, D.B.A., Hester, A.|. & Usher, M.B. (Eds) Heaths and Moorland: Cultural Landscapes. HMSO, Edinburgh. Pp 140-153. Hester, A.J., Mitchell, F.J.G. & Kirby, K.J. (1996) Effects of season and present this work at the FBT con- ference in lceland and for financ- ing my visit. Thanks also to Angela Sibbald for providing information and a Figure on the GPS project work (Fig 3). |ohn Milne provided helpful com- ments on the manuscript. intensity of sheep grazing on tree regeneration in a British upland woodland. For. Ecol. Manage., 88, 99-106. Mackenzie, N. (1999) The native woodland resource of Scotland. A review 1993-1998. Forestry Commis- sion Technica! Paper 30, Forestry Commission, Edinburgh. Millard, P„ Hester, A.|„ Wendler, R. & Baillie, G. (in press). Remobilization of nitrogen and the recovery of Betula pendula, Pinus sylvestris, and Sorbus aucuparia saplings aftersimulated browsing damage. Functional Ecology Mitcheil. B„ Staines, B.W. & Welch, D. (1977) Ecology of Red Deer. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Cambridge. MLURI (1998) MLURI Annual Report. MLURI, Aberdeen. Pastor, |. and Naiman, R. J. (1992) Selective foraging and ecosystem processes in boreal forests. Am. Nat„ 139, 691-705. Pastor,)., Moen, R.A., and Cohen, Y. (1997) Spatial heterogeneities, car- rying capacity, and feedbacks in animal-landscape interactions.). Mammal., 78, 1040-1052. Sibbald, A.M. (in press) Using GPS to track wild red deer stags. Deer. Staines, B.W. (1976) The use of natur- al shelter by red deer in north-east Scotland. lournal of Zoology, 180, 1-8. Stewart, F. E. (1996) The effects of red deer on the regeneration of upland birch woodland in the Scottish highlands. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Aberdeen. Towers, this volume Van Hees, A. F. M„ Kuiters, A. T. and Slim, P. A. (1996) Growth and development of silver birch, pedunculate oak and beech as affected by deer browsing. For. Ecol. Manage., 88, 55-63. SKÓGRÆKTARRITIÐ 2001 l.tbl. 103
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146
Side 147
Side 148
Side 149
Side 150
Side 151
Side 152
Side 153
Side 154
Side 155
Side 156
Side 157
Side 158
Side 159
Side 160
Side 161
Side 162
Side 163
Side 164
Side 165
Side 166
Side 167
Side 168
Side 169
Side 170
Side 171
Side 172
Side 173
Side 174
Side 175
Side 176
Side 177
Side 178
Side 179
Side 180
Side 181
Side 182
Side 183
Side 184
Side 185
Side 186
Side 187
Side 188
Side 189
Side 190
Side 191
Side 192
Side 193
Side 194
Side 195
Side 196
Side 197
Side 198
Side 199
Side 200
Side 201
Side 202
Side 203
Side 204
Side 205
Side 206
Side 207
Side 208
Side 209
Side 210
Side 211
Side 212

x

Skógræktarritið

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Skógræktarritið
https://timarit.is/publication/1996

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.