Skógræktarritið - 15.05.2001, Side 174

Skógræktarritið - 15.05.2001, Side 174
growth, reproduction and insect resistance of birch in Iceland. The most important vertebrate seed feeder in Icelandic birch forests is the redpoll (Carduelis flammea), while other birds feed on birch seeds to a iesser extent, The natural history of the in- sect species feeding on birch in Iceland is quite well recorded (Ottósson 1982), including information on moth species (Ólafsson and Björnsson 1995) that feed as caterpillars on the birch. Among the caterpillars that may cause the greatest dam- age are two species of tortricid moths, Epinotia solandriana and Acleris notana. Two species of geometrids are also common, Operophlera brumata and Rheuma- ptera hastata, while the third geo- metrid, Erannis defoliaria, is com- mon only in southeast lceland. The noctuid caterpillar, Diarsia mendica, feeds opportunistically on birch, but more commonly feeds on other dwarf shrubs, including the related dwarf birch (Betula nana). Outbreaks of in- sects on downy birch in Iceland are reported by biologist in this and past centuries. Caterpillars may cause widespread damage to both buds and leaves of birch in Iceland, but the nature and scale of insect outbreaks is likely different from the situation in the neighbouring countries. The experiments described here explore the regrowth of young and mature plants after simulated early season grazing. In addition, the field study ad- dresses the importance of early season grazing for the resistance of birch to insects. Materials and methods A field study was conducted in 1998 in Heiðmörk (64°N, 21°W), a study site protected from sheep grazing, where downy birch forms scattered shrublands. Most of the birches at the site are mature plants, seedlings were rare dur- ing the study. During the sum- mer caterpillar infestation of the plants was high, as shown by a high number of folded leaves called caterpillar tents. Epinotia solandriana caterpillars were the most common, but Operophtera brumala also occurred. The ground vegetation consisted of dwarf shrubs, forbs, graminoids and mosses. A group of forty mature birches were assigned to the study. The following factors were examined: (1) The effect of simulated grazing on birch growth, and (2) the effects of simulated grazing on insect resistance, as estimated from the occurrence of caterpillar tents. On mature birch, apical buds were removed before bud burst, while control plants were untreated. The bud removal simu- lated early season browsing by sheep on mature plants. Indivi- dual birches on each plant were randomly assigned to the study. All apical buds were removed on the assigned branch and adjacent branches, removing a total of forty apical buds on each plant. Regular recordings were made every other week on branch segments origi- nally consisting of approximately twenty buds, counting the num- bers of buds, leaves, shoots and caterpillartents. Few seedlings grew at the study site, but experiments on seedlings were made in outdoor plots at the nearby Icelandic Forest Research Station, Mógilsá. This allowed an indirect compari- son of the herbivory tolerance of young as compared to mature birches. Cutting treatments sim- ulated grazing effects on leaves and buds in the early season. Sixty birch seedlings were orig- inally raised from seeds in indi- vidual plant pots in unheated greenhouses and subsequently transferred to open plots in cli- mate conditions similar to the nearby Heiðmörk area. Five trays, with an equal number of plants in each treatment, were placed in the open plots and the trays were regularly rotated to ensure uni- form conditions. There were two cutting treatments and an uncut control. The plants were desig- nated to different treatments: partial foliar damage (1/4 of every other leaf), bud damage (every other bud removed), and control. Regular recordings were made every other week of seedling growth in terms of addition of leaves and buds, extension of the main shoot and individual branches. The experiment was run during the summer. The analysis of data was made using a repeated measures analysis for multifactor experi- ments (Potwin et al. 1990, Winer et al. 1991) and the statistical package SPSS 8.0 for Windows. Results Apical bud removal on mature birch in the early season reduced bud production as the season progressed (Pillai's trace F429 = 5.126, P < 0.01, fig. 1). The treat- ment also reduced leaf produc- tion (F, 32 = 9.102, P < 0.01), but no change in the effect on leaf production was detected through time (fig. 2). Budbreak occurred during a dry period when the air temperature had exceeded 0°C for three weeks. An increasing number of caterpillar tents were recorded as the number of ex- panded leaves increased. Simul- ated browsing on the plants did not affect how many caterpillar tents were added through the season (P > 0.05). There was not a strong relationship between increased leaf expansion and the maximum daily temperatures. The mean monthly precipitation was 190 mm in May, 25 mm in June, 172 SKÓGRÆKTARRITIÐ .2001 l.tbl.
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146
Side 147
Side 148
Side 149
Side 150
Side 151
Side 152
Side 153
Side 154
Side 155
Side 156
Side 157
Side 158
Side 159
Side 160
Side 161
Side 162
Side 163
Side 164
Side 165
Side 166
Side 167
Side 168
Side 169
Side 170
Side 171
Side 172
Side 173
Side 174
Side 175
Side 176
Side 177
Side 178
Side 179
Side 180
Side 181
Side 182
Side 183
Side 184
Side 185
Side 186
Side 187
Side 188
Side 189
Side 190
Side 191
Side 192
Side 193
Side 194
Side 195
Side 196
Side 197
Side 198
Side 199
Side 200
Side 201
Side 202
Side 203
Side 204
Side 205
Side 206
Side 207
Side 208
Side 209
Side 210
Side 211
Side 212

x

Skógræktarritið

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Skógræktarritið
https://timarit.is/publication/1996

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.