Skógræktarritið - 15.05.2001, Page 174

Skógræktarritið - 15.05.2001, Page 174
growth, reproduction and insect resistance of birch in Iceland. The most important vertebrate seed feeder in Icelandic birch forests is the redpoll (Carduelis flammea), while other birds feed on birch seeds to a iesser extent, The natural history of the in- sect species feeding on birch in Iceland is quite well recorded (Ottósson 1982), including information on moth species (Ólafsson and Björnsson 1995) that feed as caterpillars on the birch. Among the caterpillars that may cause the greatest dam- age are two species of tortricid moths, Epinotia solandriana and Acleris notana. Two species of geometrids are also common, Operophlera brumata and Rheuma- ptera hastata, while the third geo- metrid, Erannis defoliaria, is com- mon only in southeast lceland. The noctuid caterpillar, Diarsia mendica, feeds opportunistically on birch, but more commonly feeds on other dwarf shrubs, including the related dwarf birch (Betula nana). Outbreaks of in- sects on downy birch in Iceland are reported by biologist in this and past centuries. Caterpillars may cause widespread damage to both buds and leaves of birch in Iceland, but the nature and scale of insect outbreaks is likely different from the situation in the neighbouring countries. The experiments described here explore the regrowth of young and mature plants after simulated early season grazing. In addition, the field study ad- dresses the importance of early season grazing for the resistance of birch to insects. Materials and methods A field study was conducted in 1998 in Heiðmörk (64°N, 21°W), a study site protected from sheep grazing, where downy birch forms scattered shrublands. Most of the birches at the site are mature plants, seedlings were rare dur- ing the study. During the sum- mer caterpillar infestation of the plants was high, as shown by a high number of folded leaves called caterpillar tents. Epinotia solandriana caterpillars were the most common, but Operophtera brumala also occurred. The ground vegetation consisted of dwarf shrubs, forbs, graminoids and mosses. A group of forty mature birches were assigned to the study. The following factors were examined: (1) The effect of simulated grazing on birch growth, and (2) the effects of simulated grazing on insect resistance, as estimated from the occurrence of caterpillar tents. On mature birch, apical buds were removed before bud burst, while control plants were untreated. The bud removal simu- lated early season browsing by sheep on mature plants. Indivi- dual birches on each plant were randomly assigned to the study. All apical buds were removed on the assigned branch and adjacent branches, removing a total of forty apical buds on each plant. Regular recordings were made every other week on branch segments origi- nally consisting of approximately twenty buds, counting the num- bers of buds, leaves, shoots and caterpillartents. Few seedlings grew at the study site, but experiments on seedlings were made in outdoor plots at the nearby Icelandic Forest Research Station, Mógilsá. This allowed an indirect compari- son of the herbivory tolerance of young as compared to mature birches. Cutting treatments sim- ulated grazing effects on leaves and buds in the early season. Sixty birch seedlings were orig- inally raised from seeds in indi- vidual plant pots in unheated greenhouses and subsequently transferred to open plots in cli- mate conditions similar to the nearby Heiðmörk area. Five trays, with an equal number of plants in each treatment, were placed in the open plots and the trays were regularly rotated to ensure uni- form conditions. There were two cutting treatments and an uncut control. The plants were desig- nated to different treatments: partial foliar damage (1/4 of every other leaf), bud damage (every other bud removed), and control. Regular recordings were made every other week of seedling growth in terms of addition of leaves and buds, extension of the main shoot and individual branches. The experiment was run during the summer. The analysis of data was made using a repeated measures analysis for multifactor experi- ments (Potwin et al. 1990, Winer et al. 1991) and the statistical package SPSS 8.0 for Windows. Results Apical bud removal on mature birch in the early season reduced bud production as the season progressed (Pillai's trace F429 = 5.126, P < 0.01, fig. 1). The treat- ment also reduced leaf produc- tion (F, 32 = 9.102, P < 0.01), but no change in the effect on leaf production was detected through time (fig. 2). Budbreak occurred during a dry period when the air temperature had exceeded 0°C for three weeks. An increasing number of caterpillar tents were recorded as the number of ex- panded leaves increased. Simul- ated browsing on the plants did not affect how many caterpillar tents were added through the season (P > 0.05). There was not a strong relationship between increased leaf expansion and the maximum daily temperatures. The mean monthly precipitation was 190 mm in May, 25 mm in June, 172 SKÓGRÆKTARRITIÐ .2001 l.tbl.
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212

x

Skógræktarritið

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Skógræktarritið
https://timarit.is/publication/1996

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.