Skógræktarritið - 15.05.2001, Page 105

Skógræktarritið - 15.05.2001, Page 105
ment decision-making. But there are still two main limitations to most current DSTs: (1) firstly, most are not yet spatially explicit. i.e. they do not incorporate infor- mation at the landscape scale on the impacts of vegetation pattern and topography on ranging behaviour, partly because of a lack of data and partly because the software and computing power have only recently become sufficiently sophisticated; (2) sec- ondly, most of the available graz- ing models in the UK and else- where deal either only with open- ground vegetation or only with forest, because as yet we still have a poor understanding of for- est use when it represents only a small component of a whole complex of vegetation types. For this reason, a scoping studyis currently being undertaken to see where the main data shortages are, before we embark on new DST development for complex landscapes containing patches of forest within a ránge of other veg- etation types. This would aid managers of areas where trees form only a minor part of the landscape but where tree regen- eration is a major aim. Conclusion Grazing management for forest regeneration is a fundamentally important, yet highly complex, issue in countries such as Scotland, where natural forests have declined to such small remaining areas. Development of appropriate and sustainable management recommendations requires an integrated approach to a subject which encompasses many fields of expertise, from plant and animal physiology and ecology, through landscape sci- ence, to economics. it is only by integrating such approaches that we will be able to move towards the provision of sound prescrip- tions for a range of herbivore/for- est regeneration options within a changing economic and political climate. Acknowledgements I am grateful to Throstur Eysteinsson for inviting me to References Beaumont, D., Dugan, D., Evans, G., and Taylor, S. (1994) Deermanage- ment and tree regeneration in the RSPB reserve at Abernethy Forest. In: Aldhous, J.R. (Ed.), Our Pinewood Heritage. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh, pp. 186-195. Daneli, K., Niemela, P., Varvikko, T., and Vuorisala, T. (1991) Moose browsing on Scots pine along a gradient of plant productivity. Ecology, 72, 1624-1633. Danell, K„ Bergström, R„ and Edenius, L. (1994) Effects of large mammalian browsers on architecture, biomass, and nutrients of woody plants. J. Mammal., 75, 833-844. Edenius, L„ Danell, K. and Nyquist, H. (1995) Effects of simulated moose browsing on growth, mortal- ity, and fecundity in Scots pine. Can. J. For. Rcs„ 25, 529-535. Gilbert, D. this volume Gilbert, D„ Horsefield, D S-Thomp- son, D.B.A. (1997) The Ecology and Restoration of Montane and Sub- alpine Scrub Habitats in Scotland. Scottish Natural Heritage Review, 83, Scottish Natural Héritage, Battleby. Grace, J. & Easterbee, N. (1979) The natural shelter for red deer (Cervus elaphus) in a Scottish glen. Journal of Applied Ecology, 16, 37-48. Hester, A.|. (1995) Scrub in the Scottish Uplands. Scottisíi Natural Heritage RfWeu' No 24. Scottish Natural heritage, Battleby. Hester, A.|. & Miller, G.R. (1995) Scrub and woodland regeneration: prospects for the future. In Thompson, D.B.A., Hester, A.|. & Usher, M.B. (Eds) Heaths and Moorland: Cultural Landscapes. HMSO, Edinburgh. Pp 140-153. Hester, A.J., Mitchell, F.J.G. & Kirby, K.J. (1996) Effects of season and present this work at the FBT con- ference in lceland and for financ- ing my visit. Thanks also to Angela Sibbald for providing information and a Figure on the GPS project work (Fig 3). |ohn Milne provided helpful com- ments on the manuscript. intensity of sheep grazing on tree regeneration in a British upland woodland. For. Ecol. Manage., 88, 99-106. Mackenzie, N. (1999) The native woodland resource of Scotland. A review 1993-1998. Forestry Commis- sion Technica! Paper 30, Forestry Commission, Edinburgh. Millard, P„ Hester, A.|„ Wendler, R. & Baillie, G. (in press). Remobilization of nitrogen and the recovery of Betula pendula, Pinus sylvestris, and Sorbus aucuparia saplings aftersimulated browsing damage. Functional Ecology Mitcheil. B„ Staines, B.W. & Welch, D. (1977) Ecology of Red Deer. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Cambridge. MLURI (1998) MLURI Annual Report. MLURI, Aberdeen. Pastor, |. and Naiman, R. J. (1992) Selective foraging and ecosystem processes in boreal forests. Am. Nat„ 139, 691-705. Pastor,)., Moen, R.A., and Cohen, Y. (1997) Spatial heterogeneities, car- rying capacity, and feedbacks in animal-landscape interactions.). Mammal., 78, 1040-1052. Sibbald, A.M. (in press) Using GPS to track wild red deer stags. Deer. Staines, B.W. (1976) The use of natur- al shelter by red deer in north-east Scotland. lournal of Zoology, 180, 1-8. Stewart, F. E. (1996) The effects of red deer on the regeneration of upland birch woodland in the Scottish highlands. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Aberdeen. Towers, this volume Van Hees, A. F. M„ Kuiters, A. T. and Slim, P. A. (1996) Growth and development of silver birch, pedunculate oak and beech as affected by deer browsing. For. Ecol. Manage., 88, 55-63. SKÓGRÆKTARRITIÐ 2001 l.tbl. 103
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212

x

Skógræktarritið

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Skógræktarritið
https://timarit.is/publication/1996

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.