Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags

Årgang

Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags - 01.01.1962, Side 63

Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags - 01.01.1962, Side 63
FORN RÖGGVARVEFNAÐUR 69 fabrics are mcntioned although much less frequently than feldir: loiikápa and loSólpa, which may have been of shapes corresponding to tlie Roman paenula and casula (and perliaps the laena and lacerna as well). The lot5- kápa sometimes had sleeves. As already mentioned, the vararfeldir were rectangular but the feldir may have been semicircular or circular as well. The rectangular feldir were fastened either at the shoulder or at centre front. In the old Icelandic literature pile mantles are described as being of various colors (grey, blue and red), various lengths, with pile on both sides (black and white), strip- ed or decorated with bands or braid. Reference is made to the use of feldir to fight duels on and in several instances they were used to lie on or as covers while resting or sleeping. Examination of Icelandic mediaeval documents seemed to support the belief that pile weaving disappeared in Iceland before or about 1200. Only at the very end of the mediaeval period (ab. 1550) was the word feldur encountered and then in tlie inventories of the bishops’ seats. It was last found in 1639. It seems reasonable to assume that these feldir were imported. Apparently they were coverlets, used in church and as bedding. Twice the word kögur was found used in conjunction with feldur in these late references. The kögur, infrequently mentioned in mediaeval sources, was a covering used especially as a pall. In modern Icelandic the word means fringe. Its relationship to the word kavring which in parts of southern Sweden was used synonymously with rga has been pointed out, liowever. Its use in Iceland in conjunclion with feldur might add to the possibility that the kögur could have been pile woven or perhaps botli fringed and pile woven but not just fringed. It seems most likely that the kögur was imported rather than of Icelandic make. Tlie size and shape of the two joined pieces of pile woven fabrics found at Heynes gave no indication of their original use. Most iikely they were seraps from some Iarge worn out or outmoded garments or covers which had been reutilized for some at the present unknown purpose. Tlie appear- ance of tlie surface of tlie fragments fits well into the descriptions of the pile mantles aithough it is evident that the fabrics could not be from vararfeldir as described in Grágás because of the closeness of the locks and their irregular placing. The vararfcldir apparently had thirteen evenly spaced rows of locks (pile knots) across its width (two þumalálnir), and after completing the weaving of the mantle (four þumalálnir) the locks were then brushed to one side so that tliey would lie vertically in thirteen tiorizontal rows when the mantle was worn. It is evident that locks of outer wool Uog) cut from the washed fleece would have been of sufficient length to cover the surfac.e of a vararfeldur woven in tlie manner described above. It must be assumed, however, that the better feldir liad a more dense pile. On a mantle the size of a vararfcldur but with the density of pile of the Heynes fragments there would be about fifty Iocks across tlie mantle. It therefore seems reasonable to assume that the pile woven frag- ments froin Heynes show one of the types of shaggy fabrics used for better feldir and hafnarfeldir.
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146
Side 147
Side 148
Side 149
Side 150
Side 151
Side 152
Side 153
Side 154
Side 155
Side 156
Side 157
Side 158
Side 159
Side 160
Side 161
Side 162
Side 163
Side 164
Side 165
Side 166
Side 167
Side 168
Side 169
Side 170
Side 171
Side 172
Side 173
Side 174
Side 175
Side 176
Side 177
Side 178
Side 179
Side 180
Side 181
Side 182
Side 183
Side 184
Side 185
Side 186
Side 187
Side 188
Side 189
Side 190
Side 191
Side 192
Side 193
Side 194
Side 195
Side 196
Side 197
Side 198

x

Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags
https://timarit.is/publication/97

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.