Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags

Volume

Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags - 01.01.1962, Page 63

Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags - 01.01.1962, Page 63
FORN RÖGGVARVEFNAÐUR 69 fabrics are mcntioned although much less frequently than feldir: loiikápa and loSólpa, which may have been of shapes corresponding to tlie Roman paenula and casula (and perliaps the laena and lacerna as well). The lot5- kápa sometimes had sleeves. As already mentioned, the vararfeldir were rectangular but the feldir may have been semicircular or circular as well. The rectangular feldir were fastened either at the shoulder or at centre front. In the old Icelandic literature pile mantles are described as being of various colors (grey, blue and red), various lengths, with pile on both sides (black and white), strip- ed or decorated with bands or braid. Reference is made to the use of feldir to fight duels on and in several instances they were used to lie on or as covers while resting or sleeping. Examination of Icelandic mediaeval documents seemed to support the belief that pile weaving disappeared in Iceland before or about 1200. Only at the very end of the mediaeval period (ab. 1550) was the word feldur encountered and then in tlie inventories of the bishops’ seats. It was last found in 1639. It seems reasonable to assume that these feldir were imported. Apparently they were coverlets, used in church and as bedding. Twice the word kögur was found used in conjunction with feldur in these late references. The kögur, infrequently mentioned in mediaeval sources, was a covering used especially as a pall. In modern Icelandic the word means fringe. Its relationship to the word kavring which in parts of southern Sweden was used synonymously with rga has been pointed out, liowever. Its use in Iceland in conjunclion with feldur might add to the possibility that the kögur could have been pile woven or perhaps botli fringed and pile woven but not just fringed. It seems most likely that the kögur was imported rather than of Icelandic make. Tlie size and shape of the two joined pieces of pile woven fabrics found at Heynes gave no indication of their original use. Most iikely they were seraps from some Iarge worn out or outmoded garments or covers which had been reutilized for some at the present unknown purpose. Tlie appear- ance of tlie surface of tlie fragments fits well into the descriptions of the pile mantles aithough it is evident that the fabrics could not be from vararfeldir as described in Grágás because of the closeness of the locks and their irregular placing. The vararfcldir apparently had thirteen evenly spaced rows of locks (pile knots) across its width (two þumalálnir), and after completing the weaving of the mantle (four þumalálnir) the locks were then brushed to one side so that tliey would lie vertically in thirteen tiorizontal rows when the mantle was worn. It is evident that locks of outer wool Uog) cut from the washed fleece would have been of sufficient length to cover the surfac.e of a vararfeldur woven in tlie manner described above. It must be assumed, however, that the better feldir liad a more dense pile. On a mantle the size of a vararfcldur but with the density of pile of the Heynes fragments there would be about fifty Iocks across tlie mantle. It therefore seems reasonable to assume that the pile woven frag- ments froin Heynes show one of the types of shaggy fabrics used for better feldir and hafnarfeldir.
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198

x

Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags
https://timarit.is/publication/97

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.