Jökull


Jökull - 31.12.2001, Page 24

Jökull - 31.12.2001, Page 24
Maciej Dqbski Figure 5. Rhizocarpon geographicum agg. diameters measured on each of the moraine ridges and plotted against age of the surface on which it grows. I, II, III, IV, V, VI - numbers of moraine ridges. Lichen growth rates according to 1) Evans et al. (1999), 2) Snorrason (1984), 3) Gordon and Sharp (1983), and 4) Bradwell (2001). - Þvermál flétta afgerðinni Rhizocarpon geographicum agg. á jökulgörðum af mismunandi aldri. Vaxtarhraði fléttanna samkvœmt mœlingum 1) Evans og fl. (1999), 2) Sigfinns Snorrasonar (1984), 3) Gordon and Sharp (1983), og 4) Bradwell (2001). DISCUSSION Figure 5 shows diameters of thalli collected on each moraine ridge plotted against age of the moraines de- rived from estimates of location of the glacier snout and direct measurements. Differences between the mean diameter of the 5 largest thalli and the single largest thallus in each field are indicated. The new lichenometric measurements seem to match curve 4 (Bradwell, 2001) quite well across younger moraines whereas lichens on older moraines do not correlate as well with curve 4. The most reliable dates (based on former research) are those for ridges V and VI as they are derived from direct glaciological measure- ments (Figure 3). If the age of moraine ridges IV, III and II was c. 10 years higher, the mean diame- ter of the 5 largest lichens would match Bradwell’s curve. This could be an argument for redefining the age of the moraines and changing the glacier reces- sion curve presented in Figure 3. However lichen di- ameters collected on ridges IV and III seem to corre- late with the curves of Snorrason (1984) and Gordon and Sharp (1983). The curve constructed by Evans et al. (1999) seems to be least proper for the Fláajökull moraines. Colonisation lag time can also cause discordance in lichen growth estimates. Evans et al. (1999) used a colonisation lag time of 6.5 years for all glacier marginal zones south of Vatnajökull. Snorra- son (1984) used a much longer lag period of 12 years. Gordon and Sharp (1983) used an even longer lag 22 JÖKULL No. 51
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116

x

Jökull

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.