Jökull


Jökull - 31.12.2001, Side 25

Jökull - 31.12.2001, Side 25
Dating ofthe Fláajökull moraine rídges of 15 years for the Skálafellsjökull marginal zone, due to melting out of buried ice. It is possible that the time prior to colonisation should be even greater for the Fláajökull moraines as they include much buried ice. Comparing the lichen sizes on ridges II and I to the curves of Snorrason (1984) and Gor- don and Sharp (1983) it is possible to explain the ab- normal small thalli with argumentation provided by Maizels and Dugmore (1985). Having analysed sands by Sólheimajökull (southern Iceland) they noted that: 1) The lichens may already be of a second genera- tion - earlier colonisers having undergone natural de- cay. 2) Lichens may develop on stones that emerged to the surface some time after sedimentation due to the removal of the surface layer of the material. 3) The rate of growth may not have been stable due to climatic fluctuations. 4) Lichen growth could have been arrested by processes such as chemical and frost disintegration, frost heaving or aeolian abrasion. 5) Lack of large lichens could be the result of a lack of clasts large enough to provide optimal conditions for lichen development. The first argument put forward by Maizels and Dugmore (1985) has been emphasized by McCarthy (1999). He argues that until lichen pop- ulation dynamics are fully understood, it is unrealis- tic to expect accurate age predictions based simply on normality assumption. Lichenometric dates obtained by Evans et al. (1999) for moraines at Heinabergs- jökull formed after 1946 did not match with other data. This they explained by a lack of large boulders on the surface. Snorrason (1984) used a similar ex- planation for the lower growth rate of Rhizocarpon on the fine-grained surface of Fláajökull moraines, how- ever the actual lower rate is not given. Jaksch (1975) also pointed out active solifluction and frost weath- ering in the marginal zone of Fláajökull as factors limiting lichen growth. In the author’s opinion, all above stated reasons could play an important role in distorting a linear outcome of lichenometrical mea- surements. CONCLUSIONS The results of lichenometric dating of the surface ma- terial of moraine ridges from the Fláajökull glacier foreland should be considered with care. The data has a considerable margin of error due to uncertain growth rates and environmental conditions which may have significantly distorted the assumed linear growth rate. There is also the problem of assessing the colonisa- tion lag time. Lichenometry thus does not provide un- equivocal argumentation for changing the dates of the Fláajökull moraine ridges derived from previous re- search. However, lichenometrical investigation can help in assessing the age of stabilization of stone- filled furrows and other periglacial phenomena in the area (D^bski and Gryglewicz, 1998). Only with other data (cartographic, historical and glaciological) can the moraines be dated properly. Fláajökull retreated over 1500m between the end of the \9th century and 2000. The retreat was punc- tuated by short (usually annual) advances occurring every 3 to 7 years except during three periods, 1903- 1925, 1948-1952, 1980-2000 when the glacier ad- vanced or stood still. Moraine ridges I, II, III and IV were formed during the 20í/l century. The largest ridges V and VI must, however, have formed earlier and only overridden with little remodelling during the LIA. Snorrason (1984) states that the ridges V, VI and even VII could have formed during late Pleistocene. A clear correlation is observed between the over- all rate of the retreat of Fláajökull and climatic fluc- tuations over the 20th century. Periods of lower rnean annual air temperature in Iceland were: 1901-1925, 1947-1952 and 1965-1990 (Einarsson, 1993). Dur- ing each of these periods Fláajökull advanced, was at a still-stand or the rate of its retreat slowed down markedly. Acknowledgements I would like to thank Sigfinnur Snorrason for render- ing accessible his Cand. Real. thesis, Professor Adam Kotarba for consultation on lichenometry and Pro- fessor Elzbieta Mycielska-Dowgiatto for useful com- ments. This work is a part of a larger project con- cerning periglacial phenomena. I wish to express my gratitude to the Icelandic Institute of Natural History for the permission to export glacial till samples. JÖKULLNo. 51 23
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116

x

Jökull

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.