Jökull


Jökull - 31.12.2001, Page 25

Jökull - 31.12.2001, Page 25
Dating ofthe Fláajökull moraine rídges of 15 years for the Skálafellsjökull marginal zone, due to melting out of buried ice. It is possible that the time prior to colonisation should be even greater for the Fláajökull moraines as they include much buried ice. Comparing the lichen sizes on ridges II and I to the curves of Snorrason (1984) and Gor- don and Sharp (1983) it is possible to explain the ab- normal small thalli with argumentation provided by Maizels and Dugmore (1985). Having analysed sands by Sólheimajökull (southern Iceland) they noted that: 1) The lichens may already be of a second genera- tion - earlier colonisers having undergone natural de- cay. 2) Lichens may develop on stones that emerged to the surface some time after sedimentation due to the removal of the surface layer of the material. 3) The rate of growth may not have been stable due to climatic fluctuations. 4) Lichen growth could have been arrested by processes such as chemical and frost disintegration, frost heaving or aeolian abrasion. 5) Lack of large lichens could be the result of a lack of clasts large enough to provide optimal conditions for lichen development. The first argument put forward by Maizels and Dugmore (1985) has been emphasized by McCarthy (1999). He argues that until lichen pop- ulation dynamics are fully understood, it is unrealis- tic to expect accurate age predictions based simply on normality assumption. Lichenometric dates obtained by Evans et al. (1999) for moraines at Heinabergs- jökull formed after 1946 did not match with other data. This they explained by a lack of large boulders on the surface. Snorrason (1984) used a similar ex- planation for the lower growth rate of Rhizocarpon on the fine-grained surface of Fláajökull moraines, how- ever the actual lower rate is not given. Jaksch (1975) also pointed out active solifluction and frost weath- ering in the marginal zone of Fláajökull as factors limiting lichen growth. In the author’s opinion, all above stated reasons could play an important role in distorting a linear outcome of lichenometrical mea- surements. CONCLUSIONS The results of lichenometric dating of the surface ma- terial of moraine ridges from the Fláajökull glacier foreland should be considered with care. The data has a considerable margin of error due to uncertain growth rates and environmental conditions which may have significantly distorted the assumed linear growth rate. There is also the problem of assessing the colonisa- tion lag time. Lichenometry thus does not provide un- equivocal argumentation for changing the dates of the Fláajökull moraine ridges derived from previous re- search. However, lichenometrical investigation can help in assessing the age of stabilization of stone- filled furrows and other periglacial phenomena in the area (D^bski and Gryglewicz, 1998). Only with other data (cartographic, historical and glaciological) can the moraines be dated properly. Fláajökull retreated over 1500m between the end of the \9th century and 2000. The retreat was punc- tuated by short (usually annual) advances occurring every 3 to 7 years except during three periods, 1903- 1925, 1948-1952, 1980-2000 when the glacier ad- vanced or stood still. Moraine ridges I, II, III and IV were formed during the 20í/l century. The largest ridges V and VI must, however, have formed earlier and only overridden with little remodelling during the LIA. Snorrason (1984) states that the ridges V, VI and even VII could have formed during late Pleistocene. A clear correlation is observed between the over- all rate of the retreat of Fláajökull and climatic fluc- tuations over the 20th century. Periods of lower rnean annual air temperature in Iceland were: 1901-1925, 1947-1952 and 1965-1990 (Einarsson, 1993). Dur- ing each of these periods Fláajökull advanced, was at a still-stand or the rate of its retreat slowed down markedly. Acknowledgements I would like to thank Sigfinnur Snorrason for render- ing accessible his Cand. Real. thesis, Professor Adam Kotarba for consultation on lichenometry and Pro- fessor Elzbieta Mycielska-Dowgiatto for useful com- ments. This work is a part of a larger project con- cerning periglacial phenomena. I wish to express my gratitude to the Icelandic Institute of Natural History for the permission to export glacial till samples. JÖKULLNo. 51 23
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116

x

Jökull

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.