Skógræktarritið - 15.05.2001, Page 153

Skógræktarritið - 15.05.2001, Page 153
SKÓGRÆKT HANDAN SKÓGARMARKA / NSSE ULRIKA DAHLBERG AND COOMAREN P. VENCATASAWMY Biomass of mountain vegetation in optical satellite data SAMANTEKT Lífmassi gegnir mikilvægu hlutverki í svæðisbundinni og hnattrænni kolefnishringrás. Þörf er á að meta lífmassa gróðurs í fjalllendi Skandi- navíu. Þess vegna beindist þessi forkönnun að undirbúningi hugsan- Iegrar notkunar gervihnattargagna til að meta lífmassa fjallagróðurs. Stuðst var við eina IRS LISS III gervihnattarmynd frá I. september 1998 og gögn af athugunarstað á fjallasvæði fyrir norðan Svíþjóð |68°20' N, I8°50' E). Aðhvarfsfall var metið með IRS LISS III gögnum og gögnum af jörð úr reitum innan athugunarsvæðisins. Landslag og Iág sólarhæð í fjöllum á háum breiddargráðum geta orsakað mun á birtu í halla sem snýr í mismunandi áttir, og voru þessir þættir útskýrðir í aðhvarfsgreiningunni. Fjögur bönd og landslagsbreyturnar sin(halli), sin(átt), samverkun milli þeirra (sin(halli) x sin(átt)), og hæð voru prófuð sem skýribreytur með lífmassa sem svarbreytu. Einungis bönd 3 og 4 voru marktæk, það kom á óvart að landslagsþreytur þættu ekki aðhvarfsgreininguna. Þetta ersennilega vegna þess að ekki fengust nægilega margar hallagerðir fyrir athugunarsvæðið til að marktækar niðurstöður fengjust. )afnframt getur landslag haft þein áhrif á magn lífmassa, sem væri nægilega stórtil að gera samverkunina ómarktæka. Vegetation biomass plays an important role in regional and global carbon cycles. For exam- ple, climate change affects the vegetation cover of the earth, which influences the amount of CO^ stored in plants and soil. These effects are especially large in sensitive areas such as the cir- cumpolar ecosystem. There is therefore a need for improved estimates of biomass of forests at a global scale in such areas (Brown etal. 1999). However, there are not many studies that estimate biomass of the moun- tain ecosystems in Scandinavia. Due to access difficulties and high variability of the ecosystem in those areas, field data mea- surements are not practical. A viable alternative for such esti- mations is the use of optical satellite remote sensing data. Several studies have already pro- posed using digital satellite data for the assessment of forest para- meters such as biomass (Hagner 1990, Anderson et al. 1993, Tiwari 1994, Fazakas et al. 1999, Reese and Nilsson 1999, Steininger 2000). Remote sensing is sug- gested as the best method to estimate forest parameters at a global or regional level (Koch 1996). Although there exists many approaches to estimate biomass from satellite images these methods need to be evaluated for mountainous vegetation, especially because of the slopes and elevation characteristics of the Scandinavian Mountains and the relatively low sun angles in the area. Regression models are the most commonly used method for this purpose, and the individual wavelength bands from satellite images, or vegeta- tion indices derived from a com- bination of wavelength bands, are usually used as explanatory variables (Anderson etal. 1993, Hagner 1990, Salvadorand Pons 1998, Steininger 2000). The results, however, have differed. Steininger (2000) found a signifi- cant linear relationship between mid-infrared reflectance, derived from band 5 of Landsat TM-data, and biomass in Brazilian stands. However, Salvador and Ponds (1998) found poor fits of simple or multiple regression models of forest variables with the individ- ual bands of Landsat TM and the normalised difference vegetation index (NDVl) as explanatory vari- ables. Anderson et al. (1993) did not find a good relationship between biomass from sample points and a number of vegeta- tion indices such as difference (DVI), ratio (RVl) or normalised difference (NDVI), derived from SKÓGRÆKTARRITIÐ 2001 l.tbl. 151
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212

x

Skógræktarritið

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Skógræktarritið
https://timarit.is/publication/1996

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.