Skógræktarritið - 15.05.2001, Side 154

Skógræktarritið - 15.05.2001, Side 154
Fig. I. A: The study area on Southern and Northern sides of the Lake Tornetrásk. The test site consisted of plots grouped into clusters (white squares) with 500 m or I km between each other. B: Most clusters consisted of 9 circular plots (solid linesl.'but a few had four extra plots inside the cluster (dotted line) and two plots 500 m to the east and west from the cen- tral plot (not visible). three Landsat TM scenes. On the other hand they found significant relationships when the satellite data were stratified into vegeta- tion index classes and related to an average biomass from ground data. In many large area studies Landsat TM data are commonly used. However, nowadays there exists a range of optical satellite data, which can potentially be very useful. For example, Tiwari (1994) used all bands from ÍRS LISS (Indian Remote Sensing Program, Linear Imaging Self- Scanning Sensor) data to classify different crown cover classes. Allometric functions were esti- mated between crown cover and biomass using a log-linear model with R2 values around 0.97. The accuracy obtained with this method is dependent on the crown cover classification and the allometric model between crown cover and biomass. One of the problems of using remote sensing in mountainous and high latitude areas is that the topography and low sun angle will cause differences in illumination of slopes in differ- ent directions. The effects of topography on classification and in extracting estimates from satellite images are well docu- mented and several topographic correction models have been suggested (Teillet et al. 1982, Parlow, 1996 Gu and Gillespie 1998, Gu et al. 1999). In most cases the cosine of the incidence angle (cos(i)) is used as a correc- tion factor to reduce the effect of different illumination of slopes in different directions (aspects). Another more empirical approach is to include the product of the sine of slope with the sine of aspect (sin(slope) x sin(aspect)) as an interaction term in the regression function. This would correct for the extra variation due to the relationship between topography and satellite data. Other problems are that for periods there are no good satel- lite images from any optical satellite available. This relates to the short vegetation period in the Scandinavian Mountains, which is typically only about two months, which often are cloudy. The aim of this study was to establish the possibility to use satellite data for estimating bio- mass of mountain vegetation, in an area in Northern Sweden. For Fig. 2. The forest on the south side of Lake Tornetrásk. this attempt, regression func- tions were estimated using IRS LISS 111 data and ground data from a test site. The topographic variables sin(slope), sin(aspect), the interaction term (sin(slope) x sin(aspect)), and the elevation were also tested in the regres- sion. The IRS data were chosen because it was a cloud free scene that covered the whole test site during the short vegetation period. Materials and Methods Study area The study area was located in a mountainous area in northern Sweden (Latitude 68°20' N, Longitude 18°50' E) on the Southern and Northern sides of Lake Tornetrask (Figure 1A). The hills at the southern area.pre- dominantly slope to the north, whereas the steeper hills at the northern area slope to the south and west. The vegetation on both sides of the lake was predomi- nantly heath and open mountain birch forest (Betula pubescent ssp. aerepanovii) (Figure 2), but on the Northern side the mountain birch forest was richer and con- sisted of tall herb meadows with a few relatively large birch trees (Figure 3). The tree line was 152 SKÓGRÆKTARRITIÐ 2001 l.tbl
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146
Side 147
Side 148
Side 149
Side 150
Side 151
Side 152
Side 153
Side 154
Side 155
Side 156
Side 157
Side 158
Side 159
Side 160
Side 161
Side 162
Side 163
Side 164
Side 165
Side 166
Side 167
Side 168
Side 169
Side 170
Side 171
Side 172
Side 173
Side 174
Side 175
Side 176
Side 177
Side 178
Side 179
Side 180
Side 181
Side 182
Side 183
Side 184
Side 185
Side 186
Side 187
Side 188
Side 189
Side 190
Side 191
Side 192
Side 193
Side 194
Side 195
Side 196
Side 197
Side 198
Side 199
Side 200
Side 201
Side 202
Side 203
Side 204
Side 205
Side 206
Side 207
Side 208
Side 209
Side 210
Side 211
Side 212

x

Skógræktarritið

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Skógræktarritið
https://timarit.is/publication/1996

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.