Skógræktarritið - 15.05.2001, Side 168

Skógræktarritið - 15.05.2001, Side 168
by a large-scale approach (Bryn 2000). A one-scale study of the a-diversity would not revealed what was really happening and the serious consequences for biodiversity of the re-growth. Prospects of re-growth in sum- mer farm areas and tree-planta- tion in iceland As most summer farms are abandoned and the grazing pres- sure is reduced, the subalpine birch forest is claiming ground by succession processes. The habi- tats for antropochores, small alpine plants and lowland plants are reduced by re-growth, and the biological diversity in the summer farm landscape is low- ered all over Norway. Whether forest re-growth and tree-plantation will have the same effect on vascular plant diversity in iceland as in Norway is unknown as far as we know. In Iceland the species pool is lower (Kristinsson 1987), the climate more oceanic, the grazing wide- spread and more dominated by sheep and horses. We should, References AAS, B. and FAARLUND, T. 1995. Skoggrenseutviklingen i Norge, særlig i det 20. árhundre. AmS- Varia 24: 89-100. AUSTRHEIM, G. 1998. Plant biodiver- sity and land use in subalpine grassland. A conservation biologi- cal approach. Dr. scient. thesis, Dept. of Botany, Univ. ofTrond- heim, Norway. AXELSEN, B. 1975. Ressursutnyttelse i et fjellomráde. Seterfjellet i 0ystre Slidre - Utnyttelse av og pávirkning pá naturgrunnlaget. Cand. scient thesis, Dept. of Geography, Univ. of Oslo, Norway. BRYN, A. 2000. The effect of land- scape changes on vascular plant species richness in Grimsdalen, a summer farm valley in Oppland, south central Norway. Cand. scient thesis, Dept. of Botany, Univ. of Oslo, Norway. DAUGSTAD, K. 2000. Mellom roman- tikk og realisme. Om seterland- skapet som ideal og realitet. Dr. scient thesis, Dept. of Geography, Univ. of Trondheim, Norway. EINARSSON, E. 1987. En kort over- sigt over nogle kulturbiotoper i Island. In: Emanuelsson, U. and lohansson, C.E. (eds.) Biotoper i det nordiska kulturlandskapet. Naturvárdsverket, Stockholm, Rapport 3556: 65-68. HUGHES,). and HUNTLEY, B. 1988. Upland hay meadows in Britain - their vegetation, management and future. In,- Birks, H.H., Birks, H.).B., Kaland, P.E. and Moe, D. (eds.) The Cultural Landscape - Past, present and Future. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 91-110. HUSTON, M.A. 1994. Biological diver- sity. The coexistence of species on changing landscapes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. IENSENIUS, C.H. 1872. Om vore Beitemarker især om Fællesbeit- er. Tonsberg Bogtrykkeri, Christiania, Norway. KIELLAND-LUND,). 1992. Hándbok for feltregistrering. Viktige vege- tasjonstyper i kulturlandskapet, 0st-Norge. Nasjonal registrering av verdifulle kulturlandskap. NINA, Norway. KVAMME, M. and NORDERHAUG, A. 1999. Stolslandskapet. In: Norder- haug, A., Austad, I., Hauge, L. and Kvamme, M. (eds.) Skjotselsboka for kulturlandskap og gamle norske kulturmarker. Landbruks- forlaget, Oslo: 183-192. KRISTINSSON, H. 1987. A Guide to the flowering plants and ferns of lceland. Örn and Örlygur Publishing House, Reykjavik. LUNNAN, L„ NORDERHAUG, A. and SICKEL, H. 1999. Kulturlandskap og "Levande Stolar". Supplerende forprosjekt til prosjekt Levande stolar. HSFrapport 3/99. MOEN, A. 1998. National atlas for Norway: Vegetation. Statens Kart- verk, Honefoss. NEDKVITNE, )., Garmo, T.H. and Staaland, H. 1995. Beitedyri kul- turlandskapet. Landbruksforlaget, Oslo, Norway. NORDERHAUG, A„ IHSE, M. and PEDERSEN, O. 2000. Biotope pat- terns and abundance of meadow plant species in a Norwegian rural landscape. Landscape Ecology 15: 201-218. OLSSON, G.A., AUSTRHEIM, G„ BELE, B. and GR0NTVEDT, E. 1995. however, be aware of the danger of loss in biological diversity if proper planning and manage- ment are not implemented. In the other Nordic countries the importance of the cultural land- scapes for many red list species is given increased priority. The seminatural vegetation also demonstrates cultural aspects and values. Historical interesting seminatural habitats in lceland that should be taken into account in this connection was described by Einarsson (1987). Seterlandskapet i Budalen og En- dalen, Midtre-Gauldal, Midt-Norge. Kulturhistoriske og ekologiske forhold i fjellets kulturlandskap. Fylkesmannen i Ser-Trpndelag, Miljovernavdelingen, rapport no. 2. OLSSON, E.G.A., AUSTRHEIM, G. and GRENNE, S.N. 2000. Land- scape change patterns in moun- tains, land use and environmental diversity, Mid-Norway 1960-1993. Landscape Ecology 15: 155-170. PEDERSEN, P.A.P. 1979. Structures and ore genesis of the Grimsdalen sulphide deposits, southern Trond- heim region, Norway. Norges Geo- logiske Undersokelse 351: 77-98. REINTON, L. 1961. Sæterbruket i Noreg 111. H. Aschehoug and Co. Oslo, Norway. RUKKE, J. 1996. Vegetasjonsendringer i seterlandskapet i Nes Nordmark sameie de siste 60ár. Dept. of Geography, Univ. of Oslo. Ressurs- og miljogeografi Ser. A no. 13. STATENS KORNFORRETNING. 2000. httD://www.statenskornforretning.no/ skf/pt2502/99l 0/PT2502.htm VANDVIK, V. 1995. Mountain summer farms in Roldal, Western Norway. Vegetation, soils and ecology. Cand. scient thesis, Dept. of Bio- logy, Univ. of Bergen, Norway. VE, S. 1940. Skog og treslag i Indre Sogn frá Lærdal til Fillefjell. Med ei utgreiding um grani Sogn. Vest- landets forstlige forsoksstasjon, Medd. 23. WHITTAKER, R.H. 1972. Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21: 213-251. WILSON, M.V. and SHMIDA, A. 1984. Measuring beta diversity with presence-absence data. Journal of Ecology 72: 1055-1064. 166 SKÓGRÆKTARRITIÐ 2001 l.tbl.
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146
Side 147
Side 148
Side 149
Side 150
Side 151
Side 152
Side 153
Side 154
Side 155
Side 156
Side 157
Side 158
Side 159
Side 160
Side 161
Side 162
Side 163
Side 164
Side 165
Side 166
Side 167
Side 168
Side 169
Side 170
Side 171
Side 172
Side 173
Side 174
Side 175
Side 176
Side 177
Side 178
Side 179
Side 180
Side 181
Side 182
Side 183
Side 184
Side 185
Side 186
Side 187
Side 188
Side 189
Side 190
Side 191
Side 192
Side 193
Side 194
Side 195
Side 196
Side 197
Side 198
Side 199
Side 200
Side 201
Side 202
Side 203
Side 204
Side 205
Side 206
Side 207
Side 208
Side 209
Side 210
Side 211
Side 212

x

Skógræktarritið

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Skógræktarritið
https://timarit.is/publication/1996

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.