Skógræktarritið - 15.05.2001, Page 169

Skógræktarritið - 15.05.2001, Page 169
SKÓGRÆKT HANDAN SKÓGARMARKA / NSSE FRANS E. WIELGOLASKI Field- and bottom iayer vegeta- tion mat transplantation: A method to simulate possible effects of climate change? SAMANTEKT Þökum úr bláberjalyngsmóum var umplantað yfir í þurra fléttuheiði, en þökur úr henni voru færðar yfir í bláberjalyngsdæld 100-200 m í burtu. Breytingar á gróðrinum voru skoðaðar eftir mislangan tíma. Eftir 4 ár var minna en 20% af bláberjalynginu á lífi í fléttuheiðinni, en eftir 9 ár einungis 10%, og fimmtán árum eftir umplöntunina voru engir lifandi sprotar af bláberjalyngi eftir í hinni þurru fléttuheiði. Á runn- fléttunni Cetraria nivalis (maríugrös), sem venjulega vex á vindsorfnum hæðarbrúnum, gulnaði þalið hins vegar strax einu ári eftir umplöntun í votari bláberjalyngsdæld. Þekja maríugrasanna minnkaði niður í 3-4% eftir fjögur ár, og var einungis I % eftir níu ár, borið saman við þökur sem var umplantað innan sama svæðis. Breyting á þekju annarra tegunda við mismunandi umplöntun var einnig greinileg, en þó minni. Votara loftslag með meiri snjó- og íshulu og styttra vaxtartímabili getur haft svipuð áhrif og umplöntun á gróðurþökum úr þurri fléttu- heiði í bláberjalyngsdæld með lengri snjóþekju, líkt og kom fram með dauða maríugrasanna. Afturá móti geta loftslagsbreytingar sem valda minni snjóþekju, kaldari vetrum og meiri þurrki haft svipuð áhrif og sést á umplöntun bláberjalynggróðurs í þurra og opna fléttuheiði. The climatic growth conditions vary strongly over small distances in mountains. Particularly, this is true for the snow cover and the soil moisture. Therefore, it may be possible to simulate the effect of climatic changes by reciprocal transplantations of the vegetation between nearby sites of different soil moisture and snow cover. In most cases transplantation studies have been carried out on single plant specimens, although in some cases populations are studied (Clausen et al., 1948; Mooney and Billings, 1961; McGraw, 1987). The reason is that in most natural plant com- munities it is not possible to transplant the whole community because of the size of the plants both above and below ground. ln many types of arctic, alpine and sometimes subalpine plant com- munities, however, this might physically be done because of the small plants found in the field and bottom layer. As a working hypothesis in the present study it was expected that the species growing in a sheltered snow bed would be more strongly influenced by transplantation to a winter cold and summer dry wind exposed heath, than the species naturally growing at that community, when placed in a more sheltered and moister snow bed. It was also expected that the recovery would be slower in the more strongly stressed windswept heath than in the snow bed. Material and methods Vegetation mats of two types of low alpine plant communities at the mountain plateau Hardanger- vidda in southwestern Norway (latitude 60°N, elevation I200m a.s.l.) were chosen in the present study, but similar transplanta- tions could also been done in the subalpine mountain birch forest. One community was an olig- otrophic heath dominated by blueberries (a Phyllodoco-Vac- cinion myrtilli community), one of the most common communi- ties in the region. It is found where there is some snow protec- tion from the lowest winter tem- peratures and not too dry soil in the summer. On the other hand the vegetation period cannot be too short, which means that this type is missing also in extreme snow beds. The other community chosen was a typical oligotrophic lichen heath (an Arctostaphyleto- Cetrarion nivalis community), common at dry, wind swept, win- ter cold ridges. The two communities thus represent various climatic condi- tions, although the horizontal distance between them in the field was only l-200m. It was SKÓGRÆKTARRITIÐ 2001 1. tbl 167
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212

x

Skógræktarritið

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Skógræktarritið
https://timarit.is/publication/1996

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.