Skógræktarritið - 15.05.2001, Side 175

Skógræktarritið - 15.05.2001, Side 175
BROWSING ON OLDER PLANTS WEEK Figure 1. The mean number of buds on mature birch through the summer of 1998 in simulated grazing and corn trol treatments. Standard errors of means are shown. and 69 mm in July in Heiðmörk in during the year of study, 1998. In comparisons to previous years (1993-1997). May was unusually wet whereas June and July were quite dry. The mean daytime max- imum temperature was 12°C dur- ing the months of study (May- July) and maximum daily temper- atures did not exceed 19°C. Monthly night time average mini- mum temperatures were 5°C. Three measures of seedling growth (bud number, leaf num- bers and plant height) showed an effect of treatment over time. Bud numbers remained lower through the growing season on plants that had received early season damage (FHuynh.FekJt = 3.690, df = 6, P < 0.01) . Similarly, leaf num- bers remained lower on plant that had received early season damage (FHuynh.Fddt = 4.318, df=6, P < 0.01). The response was strong to bud damage, but not detectable for leaf damage (fig. 3- 4). Seedling height was reduced by bud damage and to a lesser extent by leaf damage (FHuynh.Feidt = 9.516, df = 6, P < 0.001). Dam- age effects on height were more pronounced than damage effects on leaves and buds (fig. 5). Discussion Downy birch responses to spring browsing at an oceanic site in Figure 2. The mean number of leaves on mature birch in the summerof 1998 in simulated grazing and control treat- ments. Standard errors of means are shown. BROWSING ON YOUNG PLANTS Figure 4. The mean number of leaves on young birch through the summer of 1998 in simulated bud grazing, leaf grazing and control treatments. Standard errors of means are shown. Iceland are similar to what is reported from continental loca- tions in northern Fennoscandia (Hoogesteger and Karlsson 1992, Karlsson et. al 1996). The indica- tion is that the birch has a high ability to recover from early sea- son browsing. Surprisingly, younger plants seem to recover more strongly after damage than mature plants. in the present study, early sea- son bud removal affects the growth of mature birch. However, there is no indication of altered resistance of the downy birch to herbivory. This is contrary, to the findings in comparable studies in continental Fennoscandia (Neu- vonen et. al. 1988) as well as stud- ies indicating that resistance to herbivores may be mediated by Figure 3. The mean number of buds on young birch through the summer of 1998 in simulated bud grazing, leaf grazing and control treatments. Standard errors of means are shown. Figure 5. The mean height of young birch through the summer of 1998 in simulated bud grazing, leaf grazing and control treatments. Standard errors of means are shown. biotic and abiotic stress to the plants (Mahdi and Whittaker 1993, Suomela and Neuvonen 1997). The climatic data suggest that bud burst on downy birch in lceland depends on constant above freezing temperature as reported in more southerly oceanic climates (Billington and Pelham 1991). While this study reflects on the bud and leaf dynamics of downy birch, more information is need- ed in the future on the biomass production and leaf biochemical content of downy birch in Iceland in relation to herbivory. The long-term goal is to make impor- tant comparisons among areas where birch grows in a different soil and climate conditions. Further analysis of the data set SKÓGRÆKTARRITIÐ 2001 l.tbl. 173
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146
Side 147
Side 148
Side 149
Side 150
Side 151
Side 152
Side 153
Side 154
Side 155
Side 156
Side 157
Side 158
Side 159
Side 160
Side 161
Side 162
Side 163
Side 164
Side 165
Side 166
Side 167
Side 168
Side 169
Side 170
Side 171
Side 172
Side 173
Side 174
Side 175
Side 176
Side 177
Side 178
Side 179
Side 180
Side 181
Side 182
Side 183
Side 184
Side 185
Side 186
Side 187
Side 188
Side 189
Side 190
Side 191
Side 192
Side 193
Side 194
Side 195
Side 196
Side 197
Side 198
Side 199
Side 200
Side 201
Side 202
Side 203
Side 204
Side 205
Side 206
Side 207
Side 208
Side 209
Side 210
Side 211
Side 212

x

Skógræktarritið

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Skógræktarritið
https://timarit.is/publication/1996

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.