Skógræktarritið - 15.05.2001, Side 190

Skógræktarritið - 15.05.2001, Side 190
SKÓGRÆKT HANDAN SKÓGARMARKA / NSSE BRYNIAR SKÚLASON, AÐALSTEINN SIGURGEIRSSON, BJARNI E. GUÐLEIFSSON AND 0YVIND MELAND EDVARDSEN Frost tolerance among provenances and families from the Picea complex in Alaska SAMANTEKT Af þeim trjátegundum sem ræktaðareru á íslandi eru mestarvonir bundnar við sitkagreni sem timburtré á Suður- og Vesturlandi. Reynslan er þó sú að sitkagreni verður á ungaaldri fyrir frostskemmd- um bæði vor og haust. Til að kanna breytileikan á frostþoli milli greni- tegunda, milli kvæma og milli afkvæmahópa innan kvæma voru frost- þolspróf framkvæmd á samtals 8000 plöntum vor og haust. Hvítgreni- og sitkabastarðskvæmi reyndust viðkvæmari fyrir vorfrostum en sit- kagrenikvæmin, en sitkagrenið aftur viðkvæmara fyrir haustfrostum. Mikill munurvará milli afkvæmahópa innan kvæma, sem bendirtil þess að hægt sé að finna efnivið sem er sæmilega frostþolinn bæði vor og haust. Samræmi var milli niðurstaðna frostþolsprófanna og skemmda sem urðu í gróðrarstöð haustið áður. Líklegt er að hægt sé að nota frostþolspróf við skamval á efniviði til notkunar í skógrækt. Introduction Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.) is the most promising tree species for production forestry in the cool, oceanic regions of southern and western lceland. Experience suggests, however, that the species is susceptible to frost damage during late spring and early autumn. Genetic varia- tion in growth rhythm and frost hardiness in spring and autumn among those provenances of Sitka spruce that can be success- fully grown under lcelandic condi- tions was examined with the aim of reducing fost damage. Freeze testing under controlled conditions was carried out on a total of 8000 Sitka spruce and Lutz spruce (Picea x liitzii) seed- lings, from among 10 families from each of 20 provenances. Differences in frost tolerance during spring and autumn were significant among provenances and among families within pro- venances. Provenances of white spruce (Picea glauca ((Moench) Voss) and Lutz spruce were more susceptible to damage from spring frosts than those of Sitka spruce. The converse was howev- er true for autumn frost damage, where damage was greatest in Sitka spruce. Correlations between frost tolerance and lati- tude, longitude and elevation at origin, as well as seedling height were not significant. There was however a strong and significant relationship between damage observed among provenances and families in the nursery one year earlier, attributed to autumn frosts, and damages observed after controlled freezing condi- tions in the following autumn. These results suggest the oppor- tunity for using freeze testing for early seleetion for frost hardiness in the nursery and in the field. Frost damage to seedlings in lceland Fall frost damage to Sitka spruce seedlings is a considerable prob- lem in lceland, occurring almost every year in some regions, both in nurseries and during the first few years after outplanting. Spring frost damage is less com- mon but can be more severe when it happens. The main goals of this reaserch were: • To test the variability in spring and fall frost hardiness among half-sib. families within prove- nances. • To test the variabíIity in spring and fall frost hardiness among provenances. • To test the effect of introgres- sion between Sitka and white spruce on dehardening in spring and inwintering in fall. • To test the possibility of using frost hardiness testing in early selection of hardy prove- nances and families of Sitka spruce. Material and methods A large spruce seed collection took place in Alaska in 1987-1988. This material has been planted in several places in Norway, Sweden, Finland and Iceland. A large proportion of this material 188 SKÓGRÆKTARRITIÐ 2001 l.tbl.
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146
Side 147
Side 148
Side 149
Side 150
Side 151
Side 152
Side 153
Side 154
Side 155
Side 156
Side 157
Side 158
Side 159
Side 160
Side 161
Side 162
Side 163
Side 164
Side 165
Side 166
Side 167
Side 168
Side 169
Side 170
Side 171
Side 172
Side 173
Side 174
Side 175
Side 176
Side 177
Side 178
Side 179
Side 180
Side 181
Side 182
Side 183
Side 184
Side 185
Side 186
Side 187
Side 188
Side 189
Side 190
Side 191
Side 192
Side 193
Side 194
Side 195
Side 196
Side 197
Side 198
Side 199
Side 200
Side 201
Side 202
Side 203
Side 204
Side 205
Side 206
Side 207
Side 208
Side 209
Side 210
Side 211
Side 212

x

Skógræktarritið

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Skógræktarritið
https://timarit.is/publication/1996

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.