Uppeldi og menntun - 01.07.2015, Side 100

Uppeldi og menntun - 01.07.2015, Side 100
UPPELDI OG MENNTUN/ICELANDIC JOURNAL OF EDUCATION 24(2) 2015100 SOCIAL ( IN )EQUALITY: COLLABORATIVE REFLECTION are faced with inequalities and, as outlined in the World Report on Disability (World Health Organization, 2011), disabled people are more likely to experience poverty than non-disabled people. According to the United Nations Development Programme (n.d.), Iceland is con- sidered to have very high human development, which is a comparative measure of life expectancy, literacy, education, standard of living and quality of life. Also, there is a lower poverty risk for disabled people compared with other countries (World Health Organization, 2011). However, even with this reduced risk, 34% of disabled people in Iceland remain unemployed compared to a figure of 5% in the general pop- ulation (Ministry of Welfare, 2013; Statistics Iceland, n.d.a.). People with intellectual disabilities constitute Iceland’s largest (37%) group of disabled people (Ministry of Welfare, 2013) and are the least likely to hold a job in the open labor market. Many still attend day-care whilst the majority works part-time at sheltered workshops (Bjarnason, 2004; Björnsdóttir & Traustadóttir, 2010; Ministry of Welfare, 2013). As a consequence, disabled people in Iceland are faced with economic inequalities and many experience financial difficulties and poverty (Rice & Traustadóttir, 2011). While income or wealth are important factors in gaining access to basic necessities, other elements such as education, skills, legal equality and respect also influence our well-being (Sen, 2000). Economic or income inequalities are linked to social inequal- ities which are, however, more extensive and relate to disparities in opportunities, assets or resources, and rights. According to the economist Amartya Sen (2000), pov- erty and deprivation can lead to social exclusion i.e., the lack of access to resources and rights which influence the person’s ability to participate in society and affect his or her quality of life. He argues that the concept of social exclusion is important in the discussion of social inequality because of its emphasis on the role of relational issues in deprivation. This article is a collaborative reflection on social inequality in Iceland, based on inclusive methodology and with an emphasis on people with intellectual disabilities. In our reflection we have adopted Sen’s conceptualization of social exclusion and aim to answer the three following questions: 1) Are people with intellectual disabilities at risk of social exclusion? 2) What kind of social participation is relevant to social inclusion? 3) And how does participation influence quality of life? COLLABORATIVE WRITING Our research collaboration started in 1999 and has since then produced an MA thesis and a PhD dissertation amongst other publications. Our collaboration is based on inclusive research practice, a term used by Walmsley and Johnson (2003) to refer to research which involves people with intellectual disabilities as more than mere sources of data. In inclusive research the views of people with intellectual disabilities are directly represented in the published findings in their own words. Combined with
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146
Side 147
Side 148
Side 149
Side 150

x

Uppeldi og menntun

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Uppeldi og menntun
https://timarit.is/publication/581

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.