Jökull


Jökull - 01.12.1992, Page 21

Jökull - 01.12.1992, Page 21
Table 2. The currently used crustal model for northern Iceland (NOR) and Raitt’s (1963) model for the stan- dardoceanic crust. Layer 1 ofRaitt’smodelisomitted due to its great variation in sedimentary thickness. Jarðlagagerð Norðurlands (NOR) í samanburði við meðaltals-jarðlagasnið úthafsskorpu, (Raitt 1963). NOR-model Raitt’s-model P-wave vel. km/s depth to top of 1. km P-wave vel. km/s thickn. km Layer 0 2.4 0.0 Layer 1 3.8 0.5 Layer 2 5.2 2.5 5.04 ±0.69 1.39 ±0.50 Layer 3 6.5 5.0 6.73 ±0.19 4.97 ± 1.25 Mantle 7.0 11.0 8.15 ±0.31 crustal models deduced from individual stations along the profile. A velocity of 1.49 km/s was used to correct for water-wave travel time. The range in water depth along the prohle is 250-290 m. P-velocities lower than 3.8 km/s were considered to represent sediments. The sediments overlie a 4.3 km/s isovelocity basement which most likely marks the transition from sediments t0 flood basalts. The transition is sharp and is repre- sented by a steep velocity gradient at a depth of 1.9- 2.3 km (Figure 4, left). The approximately 2 km thick sedimentary sequence seems to be divided into two parts. The inter-sedimentary interface has a constant depth range of about 1 km and is indicated along most of the profile as a change in the velocity gradient. However, our data resolution is not good enough to firmly confirm the existence of this interface and no reflection is observed in the data. A prominent low-velocity zone is inferred from the data recorded at OBS 12. Fast P-arrivals recorded at OBS 12 from shots E31 and E32 can be explained hy a high-velocity layer in the top of the sedimentary sequence. A low-velocity zone was needed below the high-velocity layer in order to fit the calculated velocity curves to the data. By using a low-velocity zone, the delay of the shots at a greater distance than E31 can be explained. A fault could also create the same delay but the low-velocity zone is preferred. Crustal velocities below the sediment/basalt inter- face range from 4.3-6.8 km/s. These velocities are analogous to P-velocities down to Layer 3 in Iceland (Table 2). No marked change occurs in the veloc- ity gradient down to a depth of 6 km. A velocity of 6.8 km/s at a depth of 5-6.5 km best fits the data (Fig- ure 3). This velocity is slightly higher than the charac- teristic (6.5 km/s) velocity at the Layer 2-3 boundary (Flóvenz and Gunnarsson 1991; Bjarnasonetal. 1993) but within the range observed in Iceland. The sharp decrease in velocity gradient at the Layer 2-3 bound- ary which is generally observed in Iceland is also seen in our data as the deepest rays observed probably sam- pletheupperpartof Layer3. Noindicationof amantle phase or a Moho reflection is detected in the data. DISCUSSION The Axarfjarðardjúp trough is approximately 80 km long and 20 km wide and lies in a direct contin- uation of the Krafla fissure swarm. The trough strikes 25°to the west of the N10°E Krafla fissure swarm. The junction between the Krafia fissure swarm and the Grímsey seismic lineament was seismically activated during the recent rifting episode in the Krafla volcanic system (Björnsson et al. 1977). The Axarfjarðardjúp depression is bordered in the east and west by re- cent volcanics, but volcanism is unknown within the trough itself (Sæmundsson 1974). The Axarfjarðar- djúp crustal structure consists of two major units, sed- iments and flood basalts, with a range in P-velocities analogous to those generally found in crustal layers 1 and 2 (Figure 5). A refraction seismic survey re- vealed up to 1 km thick volcaniclastic sediments with a velocity of 3.4-3.6 km/s at a depth around 0.4 km in Kelduhverfi and a velocity of 4.3 was reached at a depth less than 1 km on the coast of Axarfjörður (Flóvenz and Gunnarsson 1991; Flóvenz pers. comm. 1993). This study showed a fairly uniform sedimen- tary thickness of about 2 km within the Axarfjarð- ardjúp trough. The different sedimentary thickness observed indicates that the sedimentary layers thicken northward into Axarfjarðardjúp where the thickness is fairly constant. There is, however, a slight deviation in the upper- JÖKULL, No. 42, 1992 19
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116

x

Jökull

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.